BJP RCPsych Publications
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The British Journal of Psychiatry (1964) 110: 290-295. doi: 10.1192/bjp.110.465.290
© 1964 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WALTERS, C.
Right arrow Articles by SHURLEY, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WALTERS, C.
Right arrow Articles by SHURLEY, J. T.

Male-Female Differences in Underwater Sensory Isolation

CATHRYN WALTERS B.A.1, OSCAR A. PARSONS Ph.D.2, and JAY T. SHURLEY M.D.3

1 Psychology Technician, Behavioral Science Laboratory of the Senior Medical Investigator, Research Service, Veterans Administration Hospital, Oklahoma City 4, Oklahoma, U.S.A.
2 Professor of Medical Psychology, Department of Psychiatry, Neurology and Behavioral Sciences, University of Oklahoma Medical Center, Oklahoma City 4, Oklahoma, U.S.A.
3 Senior Medical Investigator (Psychiatry), Behavioral Science Laboratory, Research Service, Veterans Administration Hospital; Career Research Professor of Psychiatry, University of Oklahoma, School of Medicine, Oklahoma City 4, Oklahoma, U.S.A.

The study reported here is a replication of an earlier investigation of sex differences in response to underwater sensory isolation, and differences in reports of these experiences as a function of different interviewers. The subjects for the first study were paid medical students while those of the present study were drawn from a more varied population. The conditions of sensory isolation described elsewhere (10) were the same for both studies, but in the second study, the number of subjects was increased from sixteen to twenty.

Results of the present investigation confirmed the findings of the first study for the isolation experience: women gave more non-stimulus bound responses than men. However, although differences in the post-isolation interview revealed the same trend, the differences were markedly stronger for the medical students than for the more varied population.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 1964 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.