BJP College Seminars Series
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The British Journal of Psychiatry (1965) 111: 479-488. doi: 10.1192/bjp.111.475.479
© 1965 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GITTLESON, N. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by GITTLESON, N. L.

The Psychiatric Rehabilitee

N. L. GITTLESON M.A., B.M., D.P.M.1

1 Consultant Psychiatrist, Middlewood Hospital, Sheffield

Thirty-six consecutive weekly intakes to a Ministry of Labour Industrial Rehabilitation Unit were studied. The criteria of performance on course were premature termination of the course and the final employability assessment —both applied by the non-medical staff.

It was found that 16 per cent. of those documented on entry as not disabled, or solely physically isabled were primarily psychiatrically disabled. This previously unknown "new" group are diagnostically loaded with personality disorders. The psychiatric cases did not fare significantly worse compared with non-psychiatric cases. The rehabilitee suffering from a Personality Disorder and living with the spouse fared significantly worse than the other psychiatric rehabilitees.

The following factors were unrelated to performance on course: a previous I.R.U. course, sex, age (except for the "clinically subnormal"), the period of unemployment, previous admission to a psychiatric hospital, compensation claims, or whether referral to the I.R.U. was via medical or non-medical channels.

The "clinically subnormal" rehabilitees aged 25 or less fared better than those aged 26 or more.

Submitted on June 1, 1964







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 1965 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.