BJP College Seminars Series
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The British Journal of Psychiatry (1971) 119: 73-74. doi: 10.1192/bjp.119.548.73
© 1971 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BRUNSCHWIG, L.
Right arrow Articles by BIDDER, T. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BRUNSCHWIG, L.
Right arrow Articles by BIDDER, T. G.

Issues in the Assessment of Post-ECT Memory Changes

LILY BRUNSCHWIG Ph.D.1, JAMES J. STRAIN M.D.2, and THOMAS GEORGE BIDDER M.D.3

1 Associate Professor of Psychology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurology, The Medical College of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennyslvania 19129
2 Assistant Clinical Professor of Psychiatry, Montefiore Hospital Centre, Division of Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York
3 Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio

Except for the performance of the deviant 12 ECT group, memory changes during and after ECT on PA and on the PDS showed similar patterns of loss during treatment and of post-treatment gains. Benton scores were not significantly changed with treatment but showed improvement after remission. Patients with no post-treatment memory deficits had a higher relapse rate during the year than the rest of the sample. Amounts of memory change, as documented on any one of the three tests, had limited comparability with results from either of the other two tests. An objective measure devised to sample post-treatment retention of personal information showed more impairment and a slower recovery rate than the two tests of anterograde amnesia which involved artificial types of learning.

Submitted on May 27, 1970







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 1971 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.