|
|
|||||||||||
The British Journal of Psychiatry 130: 79-83 (1977)
© 1977 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
AE Maxwell
The measurement of agreement between ratings of patient symptomatology by two or more psychiatrists is discussed. It is noted that coefficients which allow for possible chance agreement are to be preferred, but they involve assumptions about the way in which chance factors may operate. Assumptions which involve prior probabilities of the incidence of a symptom appear to be too stringent, and a new coefficient, called the RE coefficient, is recommended in which is assumed to operate in a purely random way. Binary scales are discussed in detail, but methods of dealing with scales of wider range are also referred to.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Schuster and D. A. Smith Estimating with a Latent Class Model the Reliability of Nominal Judgments Upon Which Two Raters Agree Educational and Psychological Measurement, October 1, 2006; 66(5): 739 - 747. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. E Shrout Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry Statistical Methods in Medical Research, June 1, 1998; 7(3): 301 - 317. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Birmingham, D. Mason, and D. Grubin Prevalence of mental disorder in remand prisoners: consecutive case study BMJ, December 14, 1996; 313(7071): 1521 - 1524. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Rolandelli Gender Role Portrayal Analysis of Children's Television Programming in Japan Human Relations, December 1, 1991; 44(12): 1273 - 1299. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.P. Oliver and A. Butler A Living Conditions Rating Scale (LCRS) International Social Work, January 1, 1979; 22(3): 27 - 37. [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Psychiatric Bulletin | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |