BJP College Seminars Series
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McGuffin, P.
Right arrow Articles by Gottesman, I. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McGuffin, P.
Right arrow Articles by Gottesman, I. I.

The British Journal of Psychiatry 150: 581-592 (1987)
© 1987 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Is there really a split in schizophrenia? The genetic evidence

P McGuffin, A Farmer and II Gottesman
Institute of Psychiatry, London.

Although the clinical presentation and course of schizophrenia is highly variable, it is unclear whether this reflects heterogeneity at an aetiological level. The genetic evidence is reviewed concerning 'traditional' clinical subtypes as more novel categories derived from multivariate statistical methods and Crow's type I-type II classification. Recent data based on a twin series and re-analysis of older published family material suggest that attempts to divide up schizophrenia have resulted in splits between two or more categories of disorder which occupy different positions on the same continuum of liability. Thus, apparent heterogeneity is more likely to be due to quantitative difference in familial-genetic loading rather than qualitative differences. Similarly, the hypothesis that schizophrenia can be broadly divided into two groups, one genetic and the other non- genetic has little to support it. It seems improbable that any further useful and genetically relevant subdivision of schizophrenia can be effected on purely clinical grounds. Further progress awaits developments in the discovery of endophenotypes and the application of molecular genetic marker strategies.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum Mol GenetHome page
M. C. O'Donovan, N. M. Williams, and M. J. Owen
Recent advances in the genetics of schizophrenia
Hum. Mol. Genet., October 15, 2003; 12(90002): R125 - 133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
A. G. CARDNO, P. C. SHAM, R. M. MURRAY, and P. McGUFFIN
Twin study of symptom dimensions in psychoses
The British Journal of Psychiatry, July 1, 2001; 179(1): 39 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J PsychopharmacolHome page
D. Goldman and M. R. Filling-Katz
Identifying genes determining trait differences in behavior and drug response: a comment on 'Quantitative trait loci and psychopharmacology'
J Psychopharmacol, January 1, 1991; 5(1): 11 - 17.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 1987 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.