|
|
|||||||||||
The British Journal of Psychiatry 152: 660-664 (1988)
© 1988 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
YP Zheng, JP Zhao, M Phillips, JB Liu, MF Cai, SQ Sun and MF Huang
Division of Biometrics, Hunan Medical University, China.
The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (CHDS) was assessed. Interrater reliability was excellent, the item total-score correlations were good, and the internal reliability was satisfactory. The concurrent validity was tested by correlating the CHDS score with the Global Assessment Scale score; the strong negative correlation found indicated that the CHDS reflects the overall level of disability. Five distinct factors were generated by principle-component analysis; these factors account for 52.4% of the total variance. Rigorous evaluation of the numerous translated scales being used in clinical and research settings of non- Western countries is important.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. M. Bagby, A. G. Ryder, D. R. Schuller, and M. B. Marshall The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: Has the Gold Standard Become a Lead Weight? Am J Psychiatry, December 1, 2004; 161(12): 2163 - 2177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lee, Y.Y. L. Chan, and L.K. G. Hsu The Intermediate-Term Outcome of Chinese Patients With Anorexia Nervosa in Hong Kong Am J Psychiatry, May 1, 2003; 160(5): 967 - 972. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Psychiatric Bulletin | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |