|
|
|||||||||||
The British Journal of Psychiatry 158: 33-40 (1991)
© 1991 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
PE Bebbington, C Tennant and J Hurry
The hypothesis that the sociodemographic distribution of minor affective disorder can be explained by high-risk groups experiencing more psychosocial stress, defined in terms of life events and chronic difficulties, was tested. Linear logistic analysis of data from 275 subjects identified in a community psychiatric survey provided little support for this. Although high-risk groups uniformly experienced more psychosocial adversity, and adversity was strongly associated with disorder, this did not provide an adequate explanation for the increased risk of disorder. This must therefore be explained in other ways.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. S. Kendler, L. M. Thornton, and C. A. Prescott Gender Differences in the Rates of Exposure to Stressful Life Events and Sensitivity to Their Depressogenic Effects Am J Psychiatry, April 1, 2001; 158(4): 587 - 593. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rutter Transitions and Turning Points in Developmental Psychopathology: As applied to the Age Span between Childhood and Mid-adulthood International Journal of Behavioral Development, September 1, 1996; 19(3): 603 - 626. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Psychiatric Bulletin | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |