BJP Handbook for Psychiatric Trainees
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Creed, F.
Right arrow Articles by Tomenson, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Creed, F.
Right arrow Articles by Tomenson, B.

The British Journal of Psychiatry 158: 183-189 (1991)
© 1991 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Randomised controlled trial of day and in-patient psychiatric treatment. 2: Comparison of two hospitals

F Creed, D Black, P Anthony, M Osborn, P Thomas, D Franks, R Polley, S Lancashire, P Saleem and B Tomenson
Department of Psychiatry, Manchester Royal Infirmary.

Acutely ill patients presenting for admission in two district psychiatric services were randomly allocated to day-hospital or in- patient care. In both services a quarter of all admissions could not be allocated because they were too ill (half of these were compulsory admissions); these patients were predominantly manic and schizophrenic patients with pronounced psychotic symptoms and disturbed behaviour. In one service 80% (41/51) of patients randomly allocated to day-hospital treatment were successfully engaged in treatment compared with 54% (19/35) in the other service. This difference arose because only patients with mildly disturbed behaviour could be treated at the second day hospital. For patients who were successfully allocated, the outcome of treatment was similar in terms of psychiatric symptoms and social functioning. The results of a treatment trial for acutely ill patients in one district service cannot be generalised to other district services without due attention to the factors, such as staffing levels, which determine the degree of disturbed behaviour that can be tolerated in the day hospital.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
T. Burns and S. Priebe
The survival of mental health services: a pressing research agenda?
The British Journal of Psychiatry, September 1, 2004; 185(3): 189 - 190.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
M. Horvitz-Lennon, S.-L. T. Normand, P. Gaccione, and R. G. Frank
Partial Versus Full Hospitalization for Adults in Psychiatric Distress: A Systematic Review of the Published Literature (1957-1997)
Am J Psychiatry, May 1, 2001; 158(5): 676 - 685.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
R. Barton
Psychosocial Rehabilitation Services in Community Support Systems: A Review of Outcomes and Policy Recommendations
Psychiatr Serv, April 1, 1999; 50(4): 525 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
F. Creed, P. Mbaya, S. Lancashire, B. Tomenson, B. Williams, and S. Holme
Cost effectiveness of day and inpatient psychiatric treatment: results of a randomised controlled trial
BMJ, May 10, 1997; 314(7091): 1381 - 1381.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 1991 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.