BJP Try Advances in Psychiatric Treatment Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Becker, T.
Right arrow Articles by Thornicroft, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Becker, T.
Right arrow Articles by Thornicroft, G.

The British Journal of Psychiatry 173: 404-408 (1998)
© 1998 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Impact of community mental health services on users' social networks. PRiSM Psychosis Study. 7

T Becker, M Leese, P McCrone, P Clarkson, G Szmukler and G Thornicroft
Section of Community Psychiatry (PRiSM), Institute of Psychiatry, London.

BACKGROUND: Social networks are important for people with severe mental illness, and services need to assess whether they succeed in improving social contacts. METHODS: In a prospective controlled study, social network data were obtained in an epidemiologically representative sample of people with psychotic disorders both before (Time 1) and two years after (Time 2) the introduction of two sectorised community mental health services in south London (one intensive service with two specialist teams, one standard service with a generic team). RESULTS: There were significant baseline differences between sectors with social networks being smaller in the sector later served by the intensive service. Social network size increased within the intensive service sector, but not in the standard service sector. There was a significant sector effect for the network component of relatives (intensive > standard) and in the other ('non friends') component (standard > intensive) after adjusting for baseline differences. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the intensive sector community mental health service enhanced people's social networks with their relatives, relative to the standard service. The reverse is the case for other contacts.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JWatch PsychiatryHome page
Community Care for Psychotic Patients
Journal Watch Psychiatry, January 1, 1999; 1999(101): 14 - 14.
[Full Text]


Home page
Int J Soc PsychiatryHome page
M. Albert, T. Becker, P. Mccrone, and G. Thornicroft
Social Networks and Mental Health Service Utilisation - a Literature Review
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, December 1, 1998; 44(4): 248 - 266.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 1998 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.