BJP RCPsych Publications
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shajahan, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ebmeier, K. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shajahan, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ebmeier, K. P.

The British Journal of Psychiatry 174: 449-454 (1999)
© 1999 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Reduced cortical excitability in depression. Impaired post-exercise motor facilitation with transcranial magnetic stimulation

PM Shajahan, MF Glabus, PA Gooding, PJ Shah and KP Ebmeier
MRC Brain Metabolism Unit, Royal Edinburg Hospital, Morningside Park.

BACKGROUND: In healthy controls, preactivation of muscles by exercise results in enhanced motor-evoked potential (MEP) responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). AIMS: We tested the hypothesis that medicated, depressed patients would show reduced post-exercise MEP facilitation compared with controls. METHOD: Ten patients with DSM-IV depression (two male, eight female) and ten controls (three male, seven female) participated. MEPs were elicited at rest, then after exercising the contralateral abductor pollicis brevis muscle, using TMS of the primary motor cortex. RESULTS: The mean MEP amplitude recorded after exercise (expressed as a percentage of baseline) was 210% in controls and 130% in patients. There was a significant difference in post- exercise MEP between patients and controls (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Post-exercise MEP facilitation was demonstrated in controls but not in patients. This supports the hypothesis that the modulation of cortical excitability may be impaired in depression.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
D. M. Kronhaus and D. J. Willshaw
The Cingulate as a Catalyst Region for Global Dysfunction: a Dynamical Modelling Paradigm
Cereb Cortex, August 1, 2006; 16(8): 1212 - 1224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Adv. Psychiatr. Treat.Home page
K. P. Ebmeier and J. M. Lappin
Electromagnetic stimulation in psychiatry
Advan. Psychiatr. Treat., May 1, 2001; 7(3): 181 - 188.
[Full Text]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
F. MAEDA, J. P. KEENAN, and A. PASCUAL-LEONE
Interhemispheric asymmetry of motor cortical excitability in major depression as measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation
The British Journal of Psychiatry, August 1, 2000; 177(2): 169 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
P. M. Shajahan, M. F. Glabus, J. A. Jenkins, and K. P. Ebmeier
Postexercise motor evoked potentials in depressed patients, recovered depressed patients, and controls
Neurology, August 1, 1999; 53(3): 644 - 644.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 1999 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.