This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GUNN, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GUNN, J.
The British Journal of Psychiatry (2000) 176: 332-338
© 2000 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY PAPERS

Future directions for treatment in forensic psychiatry{dagger}

JOHN GUNN, Professor of Forensic Psychiatry

Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, London. Tel: 020 7919 3123; fax: 020 7919 3754; e-mail:j.gunn@iop.kcl.ac.uk

Declaration of interest None.

{dagger} See editorial pp. 307–311, this issue.

Background As the availability of mental hospital beds has fallen, so the number of people in prison has risen.

Aims To review current policy trends in British forensic psychiatry and put them in an international context.

Method Literature on the prevalence rates of psychiatric disorder in prisons and jails has been examined for the USA, England & Wales and New Zealand.

Results All studies show a high prevalence of mental disorder in prisons and jails. Authors in the USA suggest that prisons are replacing mental hospitals. In England & Wales rates of psychosis are reported as 4-10% for remanded prisoners and 2-7% for sentenced prisoners. Substance misuse among prisoners is a major problem. Prison is the preferred place of disposal for large numbers of mentally disordered people. Does this matter? Why should this be the case? Is this the cheapest option?Politicians are considering new powers to direct more people into institutions (presumably prisons) on the grounds of public protection.

Conclusions We need more information about attitudes and their formation. We need more inter-professional dialogue about the best arrangements for people with mental disorders, and inter-disciplinary education.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Punishment SocietyHome page
T. Seddon
Dangerous liaisons: Personality disorder and the politics of risk
Punishment Society, July 1, 2008; 10(3): 301 - 317.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Schizophr BullHome page
K. Naudts and S. Hodgins
Neurobiological Correlates of Violent Behavior Among Persons With Schizophrenia
Schizophr Bull, July 1, 2006; 32(3): 562 - 572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
A. TengstrOm, S. Hodgins, M. Grann, N. LAngstrOm, and G. Kullgren
Schizophrenia and Criminal Offending: The Role of Psychopathy and Substance Use Disorders
Criminal Justice and Behavior, August 1, 2004; 31(4): 367 - 391.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Adv. Psychiatr. Treat.Home page
A. Feeney
Dangerous severe personality disorder
Adv. Psychiatr. Treat., September 1, 2003; 9(5): 349 - 358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
D. Duffy, S. Lenihan, and H. G. Kennedy
Screening prisoners for mental disorders
Psychiatr. Bull., July 1, 2003; 27(7): 241 - 242.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Adv. Psychiatr. Treat.Home page
L. Birmingham
Diversion from custody
Adv. Psychiatr. Treat., May 1, 2001; 7(3): 198 - 207.
[Full Text]

Home page
 Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
P. E. MULLEN
Forensic mental health
The British Journal of Psychiatry, April 1, 2000; 176(4): 307 - 311.
[Full Text] [PDF]