This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BINDMAN, J.
Right arrow Articles by CHISHOLM, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BINDMAN, J.
Right arrow Articles by CHISHOLM, D.
The British Journal of Psychiatry (2000) 177: 267-274
© 2000 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Expenditure on mental health care by English health authorities: a potential cause of inequity

JONATHAN BINDMAN, MRCPsych, GYLES GLOVER, MRCPsych, DAVID GOLDBERG, FRCPsych and DANIEL CHISHOLM, MSc

Institute of Psychiatry, London

Correspondence: Dr Jonathan Bindman, Clinical Lecturer, Section of Community Psychiatry (PRiSM), Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF, UK

Declaration of interest None.

Background The York resource allocation formula includes a calculation of the amount needed to purchase mental health services equitably in each health authority in England. However, the amount which is actually spent on services is at the discretion of the authority.

Aims To compare expenditure on mental health services with allocation, and test the hypothesis that differences between them are to the disadvantage of services in deprived areas.

Method A comparison of routine expenditure and allocation data, and linear regression modelling of the ratio of expenditure to allocation.

Results The ratio of expenditure to allocation varies widely. Relative underspending occurs more frequently in deprived areas, although not in the four inner-London health authorities.

Conclusions The intentions of the York formula are not achieved in practice. The implications of the formula for mental health should be made explicit to health authorities, and shortfalls in mental health expenditure relative to allocation should be justified at a local level.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
V. O'Keane, A. Jeffers, E. Moloney, and S. Barry
Irish Psychiatric Association survey of psychiatric services in Ireland
Psychiatr. Bull., October 1, 2004; 28(10): 364 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
G. R. Glover
Money for mental health care in 2003/4
Psychiatr. Bull., April 1, 2003; 27(4): 126 - 129.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
K. P. HAYHURST, P. BROWN, and S. W. LEWIS
Postcode prescribing for schizophrenia
The British Journal of Psychiatry, April 1, 2003; 182(4): 281 - 283.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
B. FORSYTH and P. WINTERBOTTOM
Beds, budgets and burdens: learning disability expenditure v. workload across English health authorities: Comparative review
The British Journal of Psychiatry, September 1, 2002; 181(3): 200 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]