HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by COHEN, A. Articles by EASTMAN, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by COHEN, A. Articles by EASTMAN, N.

Needs assessment for mentally disordered offenders: measurement of ‘ability to benefit’ and outcome^*

Department of Psychiatry, St George's Hospital Medical School, London, UK

Correspondence: Andrea Cohen, Shaftesbury Clinic, Springfield Hospital, Glenburnie Road, London SW17 7DJ, UK. Tel: 020 8682 0033

Declaration of interest None.

^* This paper should be read in conjunction with Cohen & Eastman (1997). Both summarise material presented in Cohen & Eastman (2000).

¹ Tansella & Thornicroft (1998) also describe the ‘geographical dimension’, which refers to different levels within the health care system: country/region level, local level (i.e. catchment area) and patient level.

Background The Department of Health defines needs as "the ability to benefit from healthcare interventions". Outcome measurement is an integral component of needs assessment because it underpins ‘ability to benefit’.

Aims To propose a framework for addressing the measurement of outcome in relation to mentally disordered offenders (MDOs).

Method Based on a literature search, the paper reviews the definition and measurement of outcome in general mental health care and specifically in relation to MDOs. It analyses the problems of conducting outcome research in relation to MDOs.

Results A framework for outcome measurement in relation to MDOs is presented. Outcome is placed within a broader framework that relates to service evaluation.

Conclusions Current measurement of outcome in relation to MDOs is inadequate. A comprehensive framework that acknowledges the multi-dimensional nature of outcome is essential.

Researchers must be able to justify the dimensions they prioritise.