HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by COID, J. Articles by JARMAN, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by COID, J. Articles by JARMAN, B.

Medium secure forensic psychiatry services

Comparison of seven English health regions

Forensic Psychiatry Research Unit, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London

SIMON GAULT, BA, ADRIAN COOK, MSc and BRIAN JARMAN, FRCP

Department of Primary Care, St Mary's Medical School, London

Correspondence: Professor J. Coid, Forensic Psychiatry Research Unit, St Bartholomew's Hospital, William Harvey House, 61 Bartholomew Close, London ECIA 7BE, UK

Declaration of interest None. Funding from the Department of Health.

Background Regional medium secure developments have proceeded unevenly, with wide variations in resources to deliver services.

Aims To compare patients admitted to seven (pre-reorganisation) regional services and styles of service delivery.

Method A record survey of a complete sample of 2608 patients admitted on 3403 occasions between 1 January 1988 and 31 December 1994.

Results Services differed according to location of patients before admission, their legal basis for detention, criminal and antisocial behaviour, diagnosis, security needs and length of stay. Regions with more resources and lower demand provided a wider range of services. Thames services were relatively under-provided during the study period, with North East Thames substantially reliant on admissions to private hospitals.

Conclusions Uncoordinated development led to under-provision despite high demand. Certain regions prioritised offender patients and did not support local psychiatric services. New standards are required for service specification and resource allocation to redress inequality. Traditional performance measures were of limited usefulness in comparing services.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Turner and M. Salter Forensic psychiatry and general psychiatry: re-examining the relationship Psychiatr. Bull., January 1, 2008; 32(1): 2 - 6. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Coid, N. Hickey, N. Kahtan, T. Zhang, and M. Yang Patients discharged from medium secure forensic psychiatry services: reconvictions and risk factors The British Journal of Psychiatry, March 1, 2007; 190(3): 223 - 229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Tyrer Naresh Gandhi: Formerly Consultant Psychiatrist in Intensive Care at the Park Royal Centre for Mental Health, Park Royal, North West London Psychiatr. Bull., May 1, 2006; 30(5): 198 - 199. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. LEESE, G. THORNICROFT, J. SHAW, S. THOMAS, R. MOHAN, M. A. HARTY, and M. DOLAN Ethnic differences among patients in high-security psychiatric hospitals in England The British Journal of Psychiatry, April 1, 2006; 188(4): 380 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. G. Kennedy Therapeutic uses of security: mapping forensic mental health services by stratifying risk Advan. Psychiatr. Treat., November 1, 2002; 8(6): 433 - 443. [Full Text] [PDF]