CONCEPTUAL AND METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES |
Joint Professor of Physics, Gresham College, London and Director, Brain and Behaviour Research Group, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK. Tel: +44 (0) 1908 652125; fax: +44 (0) 1908 654167
Correspondence: e-mail: s.p.r.rose{at}open.ac.uk
ABSTRACT
Background Genetics is increasingly being used to explain human behaviours, with growing enthusiasm for what could be termed genetic determinism, which an ultra-Darwinist approach seeks to apply to all aspects of the human condition.
Aims To consider the validity of the claims concerning the genetics of human behaviour and psychological distress.
Method A critical review of the current assumptions about the relative contributions of genetics and the environment.
Results and conclusions Organisms are in constant interaction with their environment: that is, organisms select environments just as environments select organisms. Like organisms, environments evolve and are homeodynamic rather than homeostatic; both genome and envirome are abstractions from this continuous dialectic.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. T. A. CHENG and B. COOPER Introduction The British Journal of Psychiatry, April 1, 2001; 178 (40): s1 - s2. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. COOPER Nature, nurture and mental disorder: old concepts in the new millennium The British Journal of Psychiatry, April 1, 2001; 178 (40): s91 - s101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||