REVIEW ARTICLE |
Kensington, Chelsea and Westminster Health Authority, London
Forensic Psychiatry Research Unit, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London
Imperial College School of Medicine, Paterson Centre, London
Correspondence: Shaeda Simmonds, Kensington, Chelsea and Westminster Health Authority, 50 Eastborne Terrace, London W2 6LX, UK
See invited commentary, pp.
503-505, this issue.
Background Community mental health teams are now generally recommended for the management of severe mental illness but a comparative evaluation of their effectiveness is lacking.
Aims To assess the benefits of community mental health team management in severe mental illness.
Method A systematic review was conducted of community mental health team management compared with other standard approaches.
Results Community mental health team management is associated with fewer deaths by suicide and in suspicious circumstances (odds ratio=0.32, 95% Cl 0.09-1.12), less dissatisfaction with care (odds ratio=0.34, 95% Cl 0.2-0.59) and fewer drop-outs (odds ratio=0.61, 95% Cl 0.45-0.83). Duration of in-patient psychiatric treatment is shorter with community team management and costs of care are less, but there are no gains in clinical symptomatology or social functioning.
Conclusions Community mental health team management is superior to standard care in promoting greater acceptance of treatment, and may also reduce hospital admission and avoid deaths by suicide. This model of care is effective and deserves encouragement.
Related articles in BJP:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Chew-Graham, M. Slade, C. Montana, M. Stewart, and L. Gask Loss of doctor-to-doctor communication: lessons from the reconfiguration of mental health services in England J Health Serv Res Policy, January 1, 2008; 13(1): 6 - 12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Tyrer, A. Balod, A. Germanavicius, A. McDonald, M. Varadan, and J. Thomas Perceptions of Assertive Community Treatment in the UK and Lithuania International Journal of Social Psychiatry, November 1, 2007; 53(6): 498 - 506. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Brady and C. McDonnell Service innovation: development of a primary care-based assessment service Psychiatr. Bull., June 1, 2005; 29(6): 222 - 224. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Thornicroft and M. Tansella Components of a modern mental health service: a pragmatic balance of community and hospital care: Overview of systematic evidence The British Journal of Psychiatry, October 1, 2004; 185(4): 283 - 290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hassiotis, P. Tyrer, and P. Oliver Psychiatric assertive outreach and learning disability services Adv. Psychiatr. Treat., September 1, 2003; 9(5): 368 - 373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Tyrer, S. Simmonds, J. Coid, S. Mariott, and P. Joseph A defence of community mental health teams The British Journal of Psychiatry, September 1, 2001; 179(3): 268 - 268. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
F. Holloway Invited commentary on: Community mental health team management in severe mental illness The British Journal of Psychiatry, June 1, 2001; 178(6): 503 - 505. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||