This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in BJP
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CHALLIS, D.
Right arrow Articles by HUGHES, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by CHALLIS, D.
Right arrow Articles by HUGHES, J.
The British Journal of Psychiatry (2002) 180: 126-130
© 2002 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

OLD AGE PSYCHIATRY PAPERS

Frail old people at the margins of care: some recent research findings{dagger}

DAVID CHALLIS, PhD

JANE HUGHES, MSc

Personal Social Services Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy, University of Manchester, UK

Correspondence: Professor David Challis, PSSRU, Dover Street Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK

Declaration of interest None.

{dagger} See editorial, pp. 97–98, this issue.

ABSTRACT

Background Community-based care at the margin is a substitute for institutional care. Three factors are considered critical: definitions of eligibility, assessment procedures and balance of care.

Aims To examine determinants of the margin between institutional and home-based care, review current practice, identify the implications and contribute to planning of integrated long-term care services.

Method A selective review was made of findings from research conducted after the community care reforms.

Results Marked variability and inconsistency in eligibility and assessment processes may contribute to misplacement of frail older people. There remains capacity to shift the balance of care from institutional to home-based care within reasonable cost parameters, particularly with more integrated services.

Conclusions Greater standardisation of approaches to the determination of eligibility for social care and to assessment of need is required. Providing care at home for some of those currently entering care homes is feasible, but will require different service structures and staff roles, including specialist clinicians.


Related articles in BJP:

Old age psychiatry
ALISTAIR BURNS and IAN G. McKEITH
BJP 2002 180: 97-98. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J Soc WorkHome page
S. Dwyer
Older People and Permanent Care: Whose Decision?
Br. J. Soc. Work, October 1, 2005; 35(7): 1081 - 1092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
E. Murphy
Case management and community matrons for long term conditions
BMJ, November 27, 2004; 329(7477): 1251 - 1252.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
A. BURNS and I. G. McKEITH
Old age psychiatry
The British Journal of Psychiatry, February 1, 2002; 180(2): 97 - 98.
[Full Text] [PDF]