BJP Try Advances in Psychiatric Treatment Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A corrigendum has been published
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in BJP
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TRIEMAN, N.
Right arrow Articles by LEFF, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by TRIEMAN, N.
Right arrow Articles by LEFF, J.
The British Journal of Psychiatry (2002) 181: 428-432
© 2002 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Long-term outcome of long-stay psychiatric in-patients considered unsuitable to live in the community

TAPS Project 44

NOAM TRIEMAN, MRCPsych

Chase Farm Hospital, Enfield

JULIAN LEFF, FRCPsych

Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK

Correspondence: Professor Julian Leff, Head of Social Psychiatry Section, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF, UK

Declaration of interest None.

Funding from the Department of Health, North Thames Regional Health Authority, and the Sainsbury Family Trusts.

Background Whereas the majority of long-stay in-patients have been successfully resettled in the community, there is a group of such patients who are too disturbed or disturbing to be managed in standard community homes.

Aims To study the long-term outcome of a group of 72 long-stay psychiatric inpatients, regarded as unsuitable for community placement.

Method A prospective cohort study with follow-ups at 1 year and 5 years.

Results The patients' mental state remained unchanged after 1 year and 5 years. The level of functioning and social behaviour showed minimal change after 1 year, but then improved over the next 4 years. The profile of problematic behaviours changed significantly over 5 years, with a reduction of 50% in their frequency. Physical aggression practically disappeared. The improvements in behaviour enabled 29 patients (40% of the study group) finally to be resettled in various care homes, gaining better access to community amenities and living more independently.

Conclusions A high proportion of patients with severe disabilities, designated as ‘difficult to place’ in the community, could benefit from slow-stream rehabilitation within specialised facilities, enabling them to move into ordinary community homes.


Related articles in BJP:

Highlights of this issue
ELIZABETH WALSH
BJP 2002 181: 0. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
H. Killaspy
From the asylum to community care: learning from experience
Br. Med. Bull., January 23, 2007; (2007) ldl017v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
J.-F. Trudel and A. Lesage
Care of Patients With the Most Severe and Persistent Mental Illness in an Area Without a Psychiatric Hospital
Psychiatr Serv, December 1, 2006; 57(12): 1765 - 1770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2002 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.