This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MULLINS, S.
Right arrow Articles by SPENCE, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MULLINS, S.
Right arrow Articles by SPENCE, S. A.
The British Journal of Psychiatry (2003) 182: 293-298
© 2003 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

REVIEW ARTICLE

Re-examining thought insertion

Semi-structured literature review and conceptual analysis

SIMON MULLINS, MRCPsych and SEAN A. SPENCE, MRCPsych

Academic Department of Psychiatry, University of Sheffield, UK

Correspondence: Dr Sean A. Spence, Reader in General Adult Psychiatry, Academic Department of Psychiatry, University of Sheffield, The Longley Centre, Norwood Grange Drive, Sheffield S5 7JT, UK. Tel: +44 (0) 114 22 61519; fax: +44 (0) 114 22 61522; e-mail: S.A.Spence{at}Sheffield.ac.uk

Declaration of interest None.

Background Thought insertion is commonly regarded as diagnostic of schizophrenia. Little is known of its aetiology or pathophysiology.

Aims To examine the definition and application of thought insertion in psychiatric and allied literatures.

Method A semi-structured literature review and conceptual analysis.

Results When ‘narrowly’ defined, thought insertion is reliably identified but not specific to schizophrenia. There is a range of related phenomena (‘alienated’, ‘influenced’, ‘made’ and ‘passivity’ thinking), less consistently defined but also not specific to schizophrenia. Whether thought insertion is solely an abnormal belief (or may also be an experience) is open to question. Nevertheless, the symptom has been used to explain schizophrenia, predict dangerousness and advance theories of ‘normal’ agency. Most applications have been subject to critique.

Conclusions Despite its widespread occurrence and diagnostic application, thought insertion is an ill-understood and underresearched symptom of psychosis. Its pathophysiology remains obscure.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Schizophr BullHome page
M. Moscarelli
Passive and Active Schizophrenia: Toward a New Descriptive Micropsychopathology
Schizophr Bull, June 17, 2008; (2008) sbn057v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Adv. Psychiatr. Treat.Home page
S. A. Spence
All in the mind? The neural correlates of unexplained physical symptoms
Advan. Psychiatr. Treat., September 1, 2006; 12(5): 349 - 358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
A. V. PAWAR and S. A. SPENCE
Defining thought broadcast: Semi-structured literature review
The British Journal of Psychiatry, October 1, 2003; 183(4): 287 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Thought insertion ? - The Symptom of Schizophrenia
SUJA KURIAN
BJP Online, 25 Jun 2003 [Full text]