BJP Email content delivery - eTOCs !
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TYRER, P.
Right arrow Articles by SIMMONDS, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by TYRER, P.
Right arrow Articles by SIMMONDS, S.
The British Journal of Psychiatry (2003) 182: s15-s18
© 2003 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Treatment models for those with severe mental illness and comorbid personality disorder*

PETER TYRER, FRCPsych and SHAEDA SIMMONDS, BSc

Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK

Correspondence: Professor Peter Tyrer, Paterson Centre, 20 South Wharf Road, London W2 1PD, UK

Declaration of interest P.T. is the head of a group (IMPALOX) that receives funding from the Home Office to evaluate the new assessments for dangerous and severe personality disorder.

* Paper presented at the second conference of the British and Irish Group for the Study of Personality Disorders (BIGSPD), University of Leicester, UK, 31 January to 3 February 2001.

Background Dual diagnosis of personality disorder and severe mental illness is an important clinical association that has been under-researched with regard to clinical management.

Aims To compare the outcomes of different treatment models.

Method The outcome of patients with this combined diagnosis was compared in a systematic review of three randomised controlled trials in which different forms of community outreach treatment or intensive case management were compared with standard care.

Results The results from the three studies showed that the outcome of comorbid diagnoses was worse than that of single diagnoses. Although assertive approaches reduced in-patient care, they sometimes did so at the expense of increasing social dysfunction and behavioural disturbance.

Conclusions For those with comorbid severe mental illness and personality disorder, the policy of assertive outreach and care in community settings may be inappropriate for both public and patients unless modified to take account of the special needs of this group.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Adv. Psychiatr. Treat.Home page
A. W. Bateman and P. Tyrer
Services for personality disorder: organisation for inclusion
Advan. Psychiatr. Treat., November 1, 2004; 10(6): 425 - 433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
P. TYRER, C. DUGGAN, and J. COID
Ramifications of personality disorder in clinical practice
The British Journal of Psychiatry, January 1, 2003; 182 (44): s1 - s2.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2003 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.