Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Science, University College London, and Honorary Consultant Psychiatrist, North East London Mental Health NHS Trust, Warley Hospital, Mascalls Park, Brentwood, Essex CM14 5HQ, UK
Background Although there is a consensus that clozapine is more effective than conventional antipsychotic drugs for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, there is great heterogeneity among results of relevant trials.
Aims To re-evaluate the evidence comparing clozapine with conventional antipsychotics and to investigate sources of heterogeneity.
Method Individual studies were inspected with assessment of clinical relevance of results. Meta-regression analysis was performed to investigate sources of heterogeneity.
Results Ten trials were examined. Recent large-scale studies have not found a substantial advantage for clozapine, especially in terms of a clinically relevant effect. Meta-regression showed that shorter study duration, financial support from a drug company and higher baseline symptom score consistently predicted greater advantage of clozapine.
Conclusions It may be inappropriate to combine studies in meta-analysis, given the degree of heterogeneity between their findings. The benefits of clozapine compared with conventional treatment may not be substantial.
Related articles in BJP:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Calton and H. Spandler Minimal-medication approaches to treating schizophrenia Adv. Psychiatr. Treat., May 1, 2009; 15(3): 209 - 217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Feeney Minimal - no, minimise - yes: INVITED COMMENTARY ON ... MINIMAL-MEDICATION APPROACHES TO TREATING SCHIZOPHRENIA Adv. Psychiatr. Treat., May 1, 2009; 15(3): 218 - 220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Timimi Child psychiatry and its relationship with the pharmaceutical industry: theoretical and practical issues Adv. Psychiatr. Treat., January 1, 2008; 14(1): 3 - 9. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Calton, M. Ferriter, N. Huband, and H. Spandler A Systematic Review of the Soteria Paradigm for the Treatment of People Diagnosed With Schizophrenia Schizophr Bull, January 1, 2008; 34(1): 181 - 192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Shaw, A. Sporn, N. Gogtay, G. P. Overman, D. Greenstein, P. Gochman, J. W. Tossell, M. Lenane, and J. L. Rapoport Childhood-Onset Schizophrenia: A Double-Blind, Randomized Clozapine-Olanzapine Comparison. Arch Gen Psychiatry, July 1, 2006; 63(7): 721 - 730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ahmer, P. Arya, D. Anderson, and R. Faruqui Conflict of interest in psychiatry Psychiatr. Bull., August 1, 2005; 29(8): 302 - 304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Shooter Dancing with the Devil? A personal view of psychiatry's relationships with the pharmaceutical industry Psychiatr. Bull., March 1, 2005; 29(3): 81 - 83. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Dunkley and M. A. Reveley Successful treatment of refractory schizophrenia with combined olanzapine and quetiapine in a patient with a prolactin secreting pituitary microadenoma J Psychopharmacol, January 1, 2005; 19(1): 97 - 101. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Karunakaran Analysing the efficacy of clozapine The British Journal of Psychiatry, June 1, 2004; 184(6): 539 - 539. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. H. Kho and J. Moncrieff Author's reply The British Journal of Psychiatry, June 1, 2004; 184(6): 539 - 540. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all eLetters