BJP Handbook for Psychiatric Trainees
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in BJP
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DUNN, G.
Right arrow Articles by WILKINSON, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DUNN, G.
Right arrow Articles by WILKINSON, G.
The British Journal of Psychiatry (2003) 183: 323-331
© 2003 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Estimating psychological treatment effects from a randomised controlled trial with both non-compliance and loss to follow-up

GRAHAM DUNN, PhD and MOHAMMAD MARACY, MSc

Biostatistics Group, School of Epidemiology & Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK

CHRISTOPHER DOWRICK, FRCGP

Department of Primary Care, University of Liverpool, UK

JOSÉ LUIS AYUSO-MATEOS, MD

Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Universitario de la Princessa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain

ODD STEFFEN DALGARD, DrMed

Institute of General Practice and Community Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway

HELEN PAGE, PhD

Department of Psychology, Chester College of Higher Education, UK

VILLE LEHTINEN, MD

National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, Mental Health Unit, Turku, Finland

PATRICIA CASEY, MD

Mater Misericordiae Hospital, University College Dublin, UK

CLARE WILKINSON, FRCGP

Division of General Practice, University of Wales College of Medicine, Wrexham, UK

JOSÉ LUIS VÁZQUEZ-BARQUERO, FRCPsych

Unit for Research into Social Psychiatry, University Hospital ‘Marques de Valdecilla’, Santander, Spain

GREG WILKINSON, FRCPsych

Department of Psychiatry, University of Liverpool, UK

the ODIN group

Correspondence: Graham Dunn, Biostatistics Group, School of Epidemiology & Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK. E-mail: g.dunn{at}man.ac.uk

Declaration of interest None. Funding detailed in Acknowledgements. Paper accepted when G.W. was Editor of the Journal.

Background The Outcomes of Depression International Network (ODIN) trial evaluated the effect of two psychological interventions for the treatment of depression in primary care. Only about half of the patients in the treatment arm complied with the offer of treatment, prompting the question:‘what was the effect of treatment in those patients who actually received it?’

Aims To illustrate the estimation of the effect of receipt of treatment in a randomised controlled trial subject to non-compliance and loss to follow-up.

Method We estimated the complier average causal effect (CACE) of treatment.

Results In the ODIN trial the effect of receipt of psychological intervention (an average of about 4 points on the Beck Depression Inventory) is about twice that of offering it.

Conclusions The statistical analysis of the results of a clinical trial subjectto non-compliance to allocated treatment is now reasonably straightforward through estimation of a CACE and investigators should be encouraged to present the results of analyses of this type as a routine component of a trial report.


Related articles in BJP:

Highlights of this issue
ELIZABETH WALSH
BJP 2003 183: 273-a15. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICSHome page
B. Jo
Bias Mechanisms in Intention-to-Treat Analysis With Data Subject to Treatment Noncompliance and Missing Outcomes
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, June 1, 2008; 33(2): 158 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
M. Slade, L. Gask, M. Leese, P. McCrone, C. Montana, R. Powell, M. Stewart, and C. Chew-Graham
Failure to improve appropriateness of referrals to adult community mental health services--lessons from a multi-site cluster randomized controlled trial
Fam. Pract., June 1, 2008; 25(3): 181 - 190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
S. W. Lewis, T. R. E. Barnes, L. Davies, R. M. Murray, G. Dunn, K. P. Hayhurst, A. Markwick, H. Lloyd, and P. B. Jones
Randomized Controlled Trial of Effect of Prescription of Clozapine Versus Other Second-Generation Antipsychotic Drugs in Resistant Schizophrenia
Schizophr Bull, October 1, 2006; 32(4): 715 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stat Methods Med ResHome page
G. Dunn, M. Maracy, and B. Tomenson
Estimating treatment effects from randomized clinical trials with noncompliance and loss to follow-up: the role of instrumental variable methods
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, August 1, 2005; 14(4): 369 - 395.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2003 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.