|
|
|||||||||||
Biostatistics Group, School of Epidemiology & Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK
Department of Primary Care, University of Liverpool, UK
Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Universitario de la Princessa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain
Institute of General Practice and Community Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
Department of Psychology, Chester College of Higher Education, UK
National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, Mental Health Unit, Turku, Finland
Mater Misericordiae Hospital, University College Dublin, UK
Division of General Practice, University of Wales College of Medicine, Wrexham, UK
Unit for Research into Social Psychiatry, University Hospital Marques de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
Department of Psychiatry, University of Liverpool, UK
the ODIN group
Correspondence: Graham Dunn, Biostatistics Group, School of Epidemiology & Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK. E-mail: g.dunn{at}man.ac.uk
Declaration of interest None. Funding detailed in Acknowledgements. Paper accepted when G.W. was Editor of the Journal.
Background The Outcomes of Depression International Network (ODIN) trial evaluated the effect of two psychological interventions for the treatment of depression in primary care. Only about half of the patients in the treatment arm complied with the offer of treatment, prompting the question:what was the effect of treatment in those patients who actually received it?
Aims To illustrate the estimation of the effect of receipt of treatment in a randomised controlled trial subject to non-compliance and loss to follow-up.
Method We estimated the complier average causal effect (CACE) of treatment.
Results In the ODIN trial the effect of receipt of psychological intervention (an average of about 4 points on the Beck Depression Inventory) is about twice that of offering it.
Conclusions The statistical analysis of the results of a clinical trial subjectto non-compliance to allocated treatment is now reasonably straightforward through estimation of a CACE and investigators should be encouraged to present the results of analyses of this type as a routine component of a trial report.
Related articles in BJP:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Jo Bias Mechanisms in Intention-to-Treat Analysis With Data Subject to Treatment Noncompliance and Missing Outcomes Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, June 1, 2008; 33(2): 158 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Slade, L. Gask, M. Leese, P. McCrone, C. Montana, R. Powell, M. Stewart, and C. Chew-Graham Failure to improve appropriateness of referrals to adult community mental health services--lessons from a multi-site cluster randomized controlled trial Fam. Pract., June 1, 2008; 25(3): 181 - 190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Lewis, T. R. E. Barnes, L. Davies, R. M. Murray, G. Dunn, K. P. Hayhurst, A. Markwick, H. Lloyd, and P. B. Jones Randomized Controlled Trial of Effect of Prescription of Clozapine Versus Other Second-Generation Antipsychotic Drugs in Resistant Schizophrenia Schizophr Bull, October 1, 2006; 32(4): 715 - 723. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Dunn, M. Maracy, and B. Tomenson Estimating treatment effects from randomized clinical trials with noncompliance and loss to follow-up: the role of instrumental variable methods Statistical Methods in Medical Research, August 1, 2005; 14(4): 369 - 395. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Psychiatric Bulletin | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |