HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter View responses Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in BJP Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by CHIESA, M. Articles by FONAGY, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by CHIESA, M. Articles by FONAGY, P.

Psychosocial treatment for severe personality disorder

36-month follow-up

The Cassel Hospital, Richmond, UK

PETER FONAGY, FBA

Sub-department of Clinical Health Psychology, University College London, UK

Correspondence: Marco Chiesa, Consultant Psychiatrist and Head of Research Unit, The Cassel Hospital, Richmond TW10 7JF, UK. Tel: 020 8237 2902; fax: 020 8332 6424; e-mail: m.chiesa{at}ucl.ac.uk

Declaration of interest Grants from the Henry Smith and Welton Foundations.

¹ Reliable change takes into account measurement error according to the formula x₂–x₁/S_diff, where x₁is the pre-test score, x₂ is the post-test score and S_diff is the standard error of difference between the two test scores. A reliable change index value below 1.96 represents a change ascribable to the imprecision of the measurement.

Background In a previous report a step-down psychosocial programme for severe personality disorders was found to be more effective at expected termination of treatment than a longer in-patient treatment with no planned after-care.

Aims To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of these two psychosocial specialist programmes over a 3-year follow-up period.

Method Two samples allocated to the in-patient treatment and to the step-down programme were compared prospectively on symptom severity, social adjustment, global assessment of mental health and other clinical indicators at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after intake.

Results Improvements were significantly greater in the step-down programme for social adjustment and global assessment of mental health. Patients in the programme were found to self-mutilate, attempt suicide and be readmitted significantly less at 24- and 36-month follow-up than patients in the in-patient group.

Conclusions Improvements associated with specialist residential treatment continued 2 years after discharge. A step-down model has significant advantages over a purely in-patient model.

Related articles in BJP:

Highlights of this issue

ELIZABETH WALSH
BJP 2003 183: 273-a15. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. W. Bateman and P. Tyrer Psychological treatment for personality disorders Advan. Psychiatr. Treat., September 1, 2004; 10(5): 378 - 388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters: