Department of Psychiatry, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
Cochrane Schizophrenia Group and Academic Unit of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Leeds, UK
Department of Psychiatry, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
Medical Documentation Programme, University of Ulm, Germany
Department of Psychiatry, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
Correspondence: Dr Jacob Alexander, Department of Psychiatry, Christian Medical College, Vellore 632002, Tamil Nadu, India. Tel: 91 416 2262603, ext. 4259; fax: 91 416 2261632; e-mail: dralexander_in{at}yahoo.com
Background The pharmacological management of violence in people with psychiatric disorders is under-researched.
Aims To compare interventions commonly used for controlling agitation or violence in people with serious psychiatric disorders.
Method We randomised 200 people to receive intramuscular lorazepam (4 mg) or intramuscular haloperidol (10 mg) plus promethazine (2550 mg mix).
Results At blinded assessments 4 h later (99.5% follow-up), equal numbers in both groups (96%) were tranquil or asleep. However, 76% given the haloperidolpromethazine mix were asleep compared with 45% of those allocated lorazepam (RR=2.29,95% CI 1.593.39; NNT=3.2,95% CI 2.35.4). The haloperidolpromethazine mix produced a faster onset of tranquillisation/sedation and more clinical improvement over the first 2 h. Neither intervention differed significantly in the need for additional intervention or physical restraints, numbers absconding, or adverse effects.
Conclusions Both interventions are effective for controlling violent/agitated behaviour. If speed of sedation is required, the haloperidolpromethazine combination has advantages over lorazepam.
Related articles in BJP:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Barbui Intramuscular haloperidol plus promethazine is more effective and safer than haloperidol alone for rapid tranquillisation of agitated mentally ill patients Evid. Based Ment. Health, August 1, 2008; 11(3): 86 - 87. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Leucht, S. Heres, J. Hamann, and J. M. Kane Methodological Issues in Current Antipsychotic Drug Trials Schizophr Bull, March 1, 2008; 34(2): 275 - 285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Adams, E. S. F. Coutinho, J. Davis, L. Duggan, S. Leucht, C. Li, and P. Tharyan Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Schizophr Bull, March 1, 2008; 34(2): 259 - 265. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. S Raveendran, P. Tharyan, J. Alexander, C. E. Adams, and TREC-India II Collaborative Group Rapid tranquillisation in psychiatric emergency settings in India: pragmatic randomised controlled trial of intramuscular olanzapine versus intramuscular haloperidol plus promethazine BMJ, October 27, 2007; 335(7625): 865 - 865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Huf, E S F Coutinho, C E Adams, and TREC Collaborative Group Rapid tranquillisation in psychiatric emergency settings in Brazil: pragmatic randomised controlled trial of intramuscular haloperidol versus intramuscular haloperidol plus promethazine BMJ, October 27, 2007; 335(7625): 869 - 869. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ranjan, P. S. Chandra, J. Alexander, P. Tharyan, C. Adams, T. John, C. Mol, and J. Philip Drug combinations for rapid tranquillisation * Authors' reply The British Journal of Psychiatry, August 1, 2005; 187(2): 192 - 193. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. P. Jhirwal, P. Kulhara, D. Basu, J. Alexander, and P. Tharyan Limitations of rapid tranquillisation trial * Authors' reply The British Journal of Psychiatry, August 1, 2005; 187(2): 193 - 194. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R H. McAllister-Williams Intramuscular haloperidol-promethazine sedates violent or agitated patients more quickly than intramuscular lorazepam Evid. Based Ment. Health, February 1, 2005; 8(1): 7 - 7. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all eLetters