HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in BJP Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by SHAPIRO, A. P. Articles by TEASELL, R. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by SHAPIRO, A. P. Articles by TEASELL, R. W.

Behavioural interventions in the rehabilitation of acute v. chronic non-organic (conversion/factitious) motor disorders

University of Western Ontario and St Joseph's Health Care, London, Canada

ROBERT W. TEASELL, MD

University of Western Ontario, St Joseph's Health Care and Parkwood Hospital, London, Canada

Correspondence: Allan P. Shapiro, Rheumatology Institute,K-370, St Joseph's Health Care, 268 Grosvenor St, London, Ontario N6A 4V2, Canada. E-mail: allan.shapiro{at}sjhc.london.on.ca

Declaration of interest None.

Background Repeated case series have documented the effectiveness of multidisciplinary in-patient behavioural treatment for conversion disorders. However, in the absence of controlled research, treatment success could be attributed to providing patients with a face-saving opportunity to get better.

Aims The present study contrasts two behavioural treatments to elucidate the factors underlying successful in-patient rehabilitation of this population.

Method Thirty-nine patients underwent a standard behavioural programme. Using a crossover design, patients who did not improve underwent a strategic-behavioural treatment in which they and their families were told that full recovery constituted proof of an organic aetiology whereas failure to recover was definitive proof of a psychiatric aetiology.

Results Chart review indicated that the standard behavioural treatment was effective for 8/9 ‘acute’ patients but only for 1/28 ‘chronic’ patients. Of the 21 patients with chronic motor disorder who then under went the strategic-behavioural intervention, 13 were symptom-free at discharge.

Conclusions The strategic intervention was superior to standard behavioural treatment for patients with chronic motor disorder. Treatment components previously deemed critical for the effectiveness of behavioural treatment may be unnecessary.

Related articles in BJP:

PETER TYRER
BJP 2004 185: 188. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Successful Treatment of "Hysteria" Journal Watch Women's Health, October 19, 2004; 2004(1019): 9 - 9. [Full Text]