BJP Evidence-Based Mental Health
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cure, S.
Right arrow Articles by Adams, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cure, S.
Right arrow Articles by Adams, C.
The British Journal of Psychiatry (2005) 186: 185-189
© 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists


REVIEW ARTICLE

Randomised controlled trials relevant to aggressive and violent people, 1955-2000: a survey

Sharon Cure, MA, MCLIP

GenCertHort, Sainsbury Library, Said Business School, Oxford

Wan Lian Chua, BMedSci, BMBS, MRCPsych

Airedale General Hospital, Keighley

Lorna Duggan, MBCh B, MRCPsych

St Andrew’s Hospital, Northampton

Clive Adams, MBCh B, BAO, MRCPsych, MSci(Epid), MD

Academic Unit of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

Correspondence: Professor Clive Adams, Academic Unit of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Leeds, 15 Hyde Terrace, Leeds LS2 9LT, UK.Tel: +44 (0)113 343 2730;fax: +44 (0)113 343 2723; e-mail: ceadams{at}cochrane-sz.org

Declaration of interest None.

Background Randomised trials remain the gold standard for evaluating health interventions. This applies to the criminal justice system as well as to health.

Aims To identify and survey randomised trials relevant to forensic mental health services.

Method We searched 29 electronic bibliographic databases and acquired randomised trials involving sex offenders, arsonists or people clearly and actively aggressive, or abusive of children or spouse. Two researchers reliably extracted data.

Results Of 409 studies found, we able to acquire 300 for further inspection. They all involved particularly violent people (total n=28 669), mostly adult men; the mean study size was 197 (median 52, mode 60, range 1-1200).In these randomised trials over 700 interventions were evaluated and short-term outcomes were recorded on 345 different scales.

Conclusions Wider collaboration, rationalising treatments and simplifying outcomes could further strengthen the tradition of trialling in forensic psychiatry. Systematic reviews of these studies are overdue.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
C. E. Adams, E. S. F. Coutinho, J. Davis, L. Duggan, S. Leucht, C. Li, and P. Tharyan
Cochrane Schizophrenia Group
Schizophr Bull, March 1, 2008; 34(2): 259 - 265.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Soc PsychiatryHome page
P. Tyrer, S. Cooper, E. Herbert, C. Duggan, M. Crawford, E. Joyce, D. Rutter, H. Seivewright, S. O'Sullivan, B. Rao, et al.
The Quantification of Violence Scale: a Simple Method of Recording Significant Violence
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, November 1, 2007; 53(6): 485 - 497.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.