SPECIAL PAPERS |
King's Centre for Military Health Research, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, London SE5 9RJ, UK. E-mail: s.wessely{at}iop.kcl.ac.uk
Declaration of interest No financial interest. S.W. is Honorary Civilian Advisor in Psychiatry (unpaid) to the British Army Medical Services.
* This paper is an edited version of the 15th Liddell Hart Lecture, given at King's College London, 15 March 20 2004.
ABSTRACT
The relationship between combat and psychiatric breakdown has been well recognised for decades. The change to smaller, professional armed forces has reduced the risk of large-scale acute psychiatric casualties, and should have led to a corresponding decrease in long-term ill health, but this expected reduction seems not to have happened. Likewise, attempts at preventing psychiatric injury, by screening before deployment or debriefing after, have been disappointing. Three reasons for this are proposed: a rethinking of the relationship between trauma and long-term outcome, catalysed by the attempts of US society to come to terms with the Vietnam conflict; a broadening of the scope of psychiatric injury as it moved to the civilian sector; and the increased prominence of unexplained syndromes and contested diagnoses such as Gulf War syndrome. Traditional psychiatric injury is predictable, proportionate and can, in theory, be managed. These newer forms of injury are in contrast unanticipated, paradoxical, ill understood and hard to manage. Traditional approaches to risk management by reducing exposure have not been successful, and may increase risk aversion and reduce resilience. However, the experiences of civilians in wartime or the military show that people are not intrinsically risk-averse, provided they can see purpose in accepting risk.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Gould, J. Sharpley, and N. Greenberg Patient characteristics and clinical activities at a British military department of community mental health The Psychiatrist, March 1, 2008; 32(3): 99 - 102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Pols and S. Oak WAR & Military Mental Health: The US Psychiatric Response in the 20th Century Am J Public Health, December 1, 2007; 97(12): 2132 - 2142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. C. Frueh, A. L. Grubaugh, J. D. Elhai, and T. C. Buckley US Department of Veterans Affairs Disability Policies for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Administrative Trends and Implications for Treatment, Rehabilitation, and Research Am J Public Health, December 1, 2007; 97(12): 2143 - 2145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Tyrer, A. Balod, A. Germanavicius, A. McDonald, M. Varadan, and J. Thomas Perceptions of Assertive Community Treatment in the UK and Lithuania International Journal of Social Psychiatry, November 1, 2007; 53(6): 498 - 506. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. McFarlane and R. A. Bryant Post-traumatic stress disorder in occupational settings: anticipating and managing the risk Occup. Med., September 1, 2007; 57(6): 404 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. McDonald Mental health consequences of long term conflict BMJ, June 2, 2007; 334(7604): 1121 - 1122. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Tyrer, N. Coombs, F. Ibrahimi, A. Mathilakath, P. Bajaj, M. Ranger, B. Rao, and R. Din Critical developments in the assessment of personality disorder The British Journal of Psychiatry, May 1, 2007; 190(49): s51 - s59. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. P. Dohrenwend, J. B. Turner, N. A. Turse, B. G. Adams, K. C. Koenen, and R. Marshall The psychological risks of Vietnam for U.S. veterans: a revisit with new data and methods. Science, August 18, 2006; 313(5789): 979 - 982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Durodie Risk and the social construction of 'Gulf War Syndrome' Phil Trans R Soc B, April 29, 2006; 361(1468): 689 - 695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Vetter and S. Wessely Epidemiological approach to predicting psychiatric risk in the military * Author's reply The British Journal of Psychiatry, December 1, 2005; 187(6): 588 - 589. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||