BJP Email content delivery - eTOCs !
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WESSELY, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WESSELY, S.
The British Journal of Psychiatry (2005) 186: 459-466
© 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists


SPECIAL PAPERS

Risk, psychiatry and the military*

SIMON WESSELY, FRCP

King's Centre for Military Health Research, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, London SE5 9RJ, UK. E-mail: s.wessely{at}iop.kcl.ac.uk

Declaration of interest No financial interest. S.W. is Honorary Civilian Advisor in Psychiatry (unpaid) to the British Army Medical Services.

* This paper is an edited version of the 15th Liddell Hart Lecture, given at King's College London, 15 March 20 2004.

ABSTRACT

The relationship between combat and psychiatric breakdown has been well recognised for decades. The change to smaller, professional armed forces has reduced the risk of large-scale acute psychiatric casualties, and should have led to a corresponding decrease in long-term ill health, but this expected reduction seems not to have happened. Likewise, attempts at preventing psychiatric injury, by screening before deployment or debriefing after, have been disappointing. Three reasons for this are proposed: a rethinking of the relationship between trauma and long-term outcome, catalysed by the attempts of US society to come to terms with the Vietnam conflict; a broadening of the scope of psychiatric injury as it moved to the civilian sector; and the increased prominence of unexplained syndromes and contested diagnoses such as Gulf War syndrome. Traditional psychiatric injury is predictable, proportionate and can, in theory, be managed. These newer forms of injury are in contrast unanticipated, paradoxical, ill understood and hard to manage. Traditional approaches to risk management by reducing exposure have not been successful, and may increase risk aversion and reduce resilience. However, the experiences of civilians in wartime or the military show that people are not intrinsically risk-averse, provided they can see purpose in accepting risk.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
M. Gould, J. Sharpley, and N. Greenberg
Patient characteristics and clinical activities at a British military department of community mental health
Psychiatr. Bull., March 1, 2008; 32(3): 99 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
H. Pols and S. Oak
WAR & Military Mental Health: The US Psychiatric Response in the 20th Century
Am J Public Health, December 1, 2007; 97(12): 2132 - 2142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
B. C. Frueh, A. L. Grubaugh, J. D. Elhai, and T. C. Buckley
US Department of Veterans Affairs Disability Policies for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Administrative Trends and Implications for Treatment, Rehabilitation, and Research
Am J Public Health, December 1, 2007; 97(12): 2143 - 2145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Social PsychiatryHome page
P. Tyrer, A. Balod, A. Germanavicius, A. McDonald, M. Varadan, and J. Thomas
Perceptions of assertive community treatment in the UK and Lithuania.
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, November 1, 2007; 53(6): 498 - 506.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Occup Med (Lond)Home page
A. C. McFarlane and R. A. Bryant
Post-traumatic stress disorder in occupational settings: anticipating and managing the risk
Occup. Med., September 1, 2007; 57(6): 404 - 410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
G. McDonald
Mental health consequences of long term conflict
BMJ, June 2, 2007; 334(7604): 1121 - 1122.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
P. Tyrer, N. Coombs, F. Ibrahimi, A. Mathilakath, P. Bajaj, M. Ranger, B. Rao, and R. Din
Critical developments in the assessment of personality disorder
The British Journal of Psychiatry, May 1, 2007; 190(49): s51 - s59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
B. P. Dohrenwend, J. B. Turner, N. A. Turse, B. G. Adams, K. C. Koenen, and R. Marshall
The psychological risks of Vietnam for U.S. veterans: a revisit with new data and methods.
Science, August 18, 2006; 313(5789): 979 - 982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
S. Vetter and S. Wessely
Epidemiological approach to predicting psychiatric risk in the military * Author's reply
The British Journal of Psychiatry, December 1, 2005; 187(6): 588 - 589.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.