This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in BJP
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SMYTH, B. P.
Right arrow Articles by KEENAN, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SMYTH, B. P.
Right arrow Articles by KEENAN, E.
The British Journal of Psychiatry (2005) 187: 360-365
© 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

In-patient treatment of opiate dependence: medium-term follow-up outcomes

BOBBY P. SMYTH, MRCPsych

AIDS/Drugs Service, Cherry Orchard Hospital, Dublin 10

JOE BARRY, MD

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Trinity College, Dublin

ALISON LANE, MSc

St Patrick’s Hospital, Dublin 8

MARY COTTER, RGN RPN

AIDS/Drugs Service, Cherry Orchard Hospital, Dublin 10

MARY O’NEILL, RGN

Baggot Street Clinic, Dublin 4

CAROLINE QUINN, RGN and EAMON KEENAN, MRCPsych

AIDS/Drugs Service, Cherry Orchard Hospital, Dublin 10, Ireland

Correspondence: Dr Bobby P. Smyth, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Tallaght, Dublin 24, Ireland. E-mail: bobby.smyth{at}swahb.ie

Declaration of interest None.

Background The outcome for opiate-dependent patients seeking abstinence is unclear in this era of improved access to methadone maintenance.

Aims To measure the outcome 2–3 years after in-patient treatment.

Method Opiate-dependent patients admitted with a goal of abstinence were followed-up. A structured interview examined drug use and treatment in the preceding month.

Results Five patients had died and 109 (76%) of the remaining 144 were interviewed. Fifty per cent (54 patients) reported recent opiate misuse and 57% (62) were on methadone maintenance. Twenty-three per cent (25 patients) were abstinent (i.e. neither using opiates nor on methadone maintenance). Abstinence was significantly associated with completion of the 6-week in-patienttreatment programme and attendance at out-patient after-care, and negatively associated with a family history of substance misuse.

Conclusions Abstinence remains an attainable goal. As the principal influence on outcome was treatment adherence, inpatient services should seek to enhance rates of programme completion. After-care should be provided to patients. We caution against use of pre-treatment patient characteristics as criteria for prioritising access to in-patient treatment.


Related articles in BJP:

Highlights of this issue
KIMBERLIE DEAN
BJP 2005 187: 301-a13. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Evid. Based Ment. HealthHome page
E. Day
Review: Adding psychosocial interventions to pharmacotherapy for opioid detoxification improves outcomes
Evid. Based Ment. Health, February 1, 2009; 12(1): 15 - 15.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
G. Critchlow and H. Nadeem
Abstinence-oriented treatment for opiate addiction
The British Journal of Psychiatry, March 1, 2006; 188(3): 292 - 292.
[Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Study does not confirm therapeutic effect
Richard Braithwaite
BJP Online, 18 Nov 2005 [Full text]