This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PURCELL, R.
Right arrow Articles by MULLEN, P. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PURCELL, R.
Right arrow Articles by MULLEN, P. E.
The British Journal of Psychiatry (2005) 187: 416-420
© 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Association between stalking victimisation and psychiatric morbidity in a random community sample

ROSEMARY PURCELL, PhD, MICHELE PATHÉ, MBBS and PAUL E. MULLEN, DSc

Victorian Institute of Forensic Mental Health, Fairfield, Victoria, and Department of Psychological Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia

Correspondence: Dr Rosemary Purcell, ORYGEN Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Locked Bag 10, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia. Tel: +61 3 9342 2800; fax: +61 3 9342 2948; e-mail: rpurcell{at}unimelb.edu.au

Declaration of interest None. Funding detailed in Acknowledgement.

Background No studies have assessed psychopathology among victims of stalking who have not sought specialist help.

Aims To examine the associations between stalking victimisation and psychiatric morbidity in a representative community sample.

Method A random community sample (n=1844) completed surveys examining the experience of harassment and current mental health. The 28-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ–28) and the Impact of Event Scale were used to assess symptomatology in those reporting brief harassment (n=196) or protracted stalking (n=236) and a matched control group reporting no harassment (n=432).

Results Rates of caseness on the GHQ–28 were higher among stalking victims (36.4%) than among controls (19.3%) and victims of brief harassment (21.9%). Psychiatric morbidity did not differ according to the recency of victimisation, with 34.1% of victims meeting caseness criteria 1 year after stalking had ended.

Conclusions In a significant minority of victims, stalking victimisation is associated with psychiatric morbidity that may persist long after it has ceased. Recognition of the immediate and long-term impacts of stalking is necessary to assist victims and help alleviate distress and long-term disability.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Interpers ViolenceHome page
M. C. Johnson and G. A. Kercher
Identifying Predictors of Negative Psychological Reactions to Stalking Victimization
J Interpers Violence, May 1, 2009; 24(5): 866 - 882.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
R. Purcell, B. Moller, T. Flower, and P. E. Mullen
Stalking among juveniles
The British Journal of Psychiatry, May 1, 2009; 194(5): 451 - 455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J Soc PsychiatryHome page
R. J. Mcivor, L. Potter, and L. Davies
Stalking Behaviour By Patients Towards Psychiatrists in a Large Mental Health Organization
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, July 1, 2008; 54(4): 350 - 357.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
R. J. McIVOR and E. PETCH
Stalking of mental health professionals: an underrecognised problem
The British Journal of Psychiatry, May 1, 2006; 188(5): 403 - 404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
P. TYRER

The British Journal of Psychiatry, May 1, 2006; 188(5): 500 - 500.
[Full Text] [PDF]