The British Journal of Psychiatry (2006) 188: 250-254. doi: 10.1192/bjp.188.3.250
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HADDOCK, G.
Right arrow Articles by TARRIER, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HADDOCK, G.
Right arrow Articles by TARRIER, N.

Influence of age on outcome of psychological treatments in first-episode psychosis

GILLIAN HADDOCK, PhD, SHÔN LEWIS, MD, PhD, RICHARD BENTALL, PhD, GRAHAM DUNN, PhD, RICHARD DRAKE, MD, PhD and NICHOLAS TARRIER, PhD

School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Correspondence: Professor Gillian Haddock, School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Rutherford Rutherford House, Manchester Science Park, Lloyd Street North, Manchester M15 6SZ, UK. Tel: +44 (0)161 929 6836; Fax: +44 (0) 161 275 8487; e-mail: gillian.haddock{at}manchester.ac.uk

Declaration of interest None. Funding detailed in Acknowledgements.

Background Psychological treatments have been shown to be effective in patients with psychosis. However, the studies published to date have included participants across wide age ranges, so few conclusions can be reached about the effectiveness of such treatments in relation to age.

Aims To evaluate outcomes by age in a randomised controlled trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT), supportive counselling and treatment as usual.

Method Outcomes were evaluated in terms of symptoms, social functioning, insight and therapeutic alliance according to age at 3- and 18-month follow-up.

Results Younger participants responded better to supportive counselling than to treatment as usual and CBTover 3 months. Older participants responded better to CBT than to supportive counselling over 18 months. Younger participants showed a greater increase in insight after CBT compared with treatment as usual and supportive counselling, and were more difficult to engage in therapy.

Conclusions Young people may have different needs with regard to engagement in psychological treatments. Treatment providers need to take age-specific factors into account.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
M. Alvarez-Jimenez, S. E. Hetrick, C. Gonzalez-Blanch, J. F. Gleeson, and P. D. McGorry
Non-pharmacological management of antipsychotic-induced weight gain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
The British Journal of Psychiatry, August 1, 2008; 193(2): 101 - 107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]