BJP RCPsych Publications
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The British Journal of Psychiatry (2006) 188: 460-464. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.104.007658
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in BJP
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HOE, J.
Right arrow Articles by ORRELL, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HOE, J.
Right arrow Articles by ORRELL, M.

Quality of life of people with dementia in residential care homes

J. HOE, MSc, G. HANCOCK, PhD, G. LIVINGSTON, MD and M. ORRELL, PhD

University College London, UK

Correspondence: Professor M. Orrell, Mascalls Park, Mascalls Lane, Brentwood CM14 5HQ, UK. E-mail: m.orrell{at}ucl.ac.uk

Declaration of interest None.

Background Many people with dementia live in residential homes, but little is known about their quality of life.

Aims To compare the views of residents with dementia with the views of staff as to their quality of life, and to look at factors associated withthese ratings.

Method The Quality of Life in Alzheimer’s Disease (QoL–AD) scale was used to rate residents’and staff’s perceptions of the quality of life of 238 residents of 24 residential homes in the UK.

Results There were 119 QoL–AD scales completed by both residents and staff. For the residents, high QoL–AD scores strongly correlated with lower scores for depression ({rho}=-0.53, P<0.0001) and anxiety ({rho}=-0.50, P<0.001). In contrast, better quality of life as rated by staff correlated most strongly with increased dependency ({rho}=-0.53, P<0.001) and behaviour problems ({rho}=-0.40, P<0.001).

Conclusions The QoL–AD could be used as an effective measure of the quality of life of people with dementia in residential homes. Whereas mood was the main predictor of residents’own assessment of their quality of life, staff ratings were strongly linked with dependency. Staff should be aware that mood rather than level of dependency has a greater impacton residents’ quality of life.


Related articles in BJP:

PETER TYRER
BJP 2006 188: 500. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
G Livingston, C Cooper, J Woods, A Milne, and C Katona
Successful ageing in adversity: the LASER-AD longitudinal study
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, June 1, 2008; 79(6): 641 - 645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.