|
|
|||||||||||
Applied Mental Health Research Group (AMHR), Center for International Health and Development, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
Epidemiology of Developmental Brain Disorders Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute, G. H. Sergievsky Center, Faculty of Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, and Department of International Health, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana
Division of Clinical and Genetic Epidemiology, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York
World Vision International, Washington, DC, USA
War Child Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Division of Clinical and Genetic Epidemiology, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York
AMHR, Center for International Health and Development, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Correspondence: Dr Judith Bass, Center for International Health and Development, Boston University School of Public Health, 85 East Concord Street, 5th Floor, Boston, MA 02118, USA. Tel: +1 617 414 1264; fax: +1 617 414 1261; e-mail: jbass{at}bu.edu
Background A randomised controlled trial comparing group interpersonal psychotherapy with treatment as usual among rural Ugandans meeting symptom and functional impairment criteria for DSMIV major depressive disorder or sub-threshold disorder showed evidence of effectiveness immediately following the intervention.
Aims To assess the long-term effectiveness of this therapy over a subsequent 6-month period.
Method A follow-up study of trial participants was conducted in which the primary outcomes were depression diagnosis, depressive symptoms and functional impairment.
Results At 6 months, participants receiving the group interpersonal psychotherapy had mean depression symptom and functional impairment scores respectively 14.0 points (95% CI 12.215.8; P<0.0001) and 5.0 points (95% CI 3.66.4; P<0.0001) lower than the control group. Similarly, the rate of major depression among those in the treatment arm (11.7%) was significantly lower than that in the control arm (54.9%) (P<0.0001).
Conclusions Participation in a 16-week group interpersonal psychotherapy intervention continued to confer a substantial mental health benefit 6 months after conclusion of the formal intervention.
Related articles in BJP:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Tyrer From the Editor's desk The British Journal of Psychiatry, May 1, 2007; 190(5): 456 - 456. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Patel Mental health in low- and middle-income countries Br. Med. Bull., April 30, 2007; (2007) ldm010v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Psychiatric Bulletin | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |