BJP Email content delivery - eTOCs !
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The British Journal of Psychiatry (2006) 189: 297-308. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.105.016006
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in BJP
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GILBODY, S.
Right arrow Articles by WHITTY, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GILBODY, S.
Right arrow Articles by WHITTY, P.

REVIEW ARTICLES

Costs and consequences of enhanced primary care for depression

Systematic review of randomised economic evaluations

SIMON GILBODY, DPhil, MRCPsych

Department of Health Sciences, University of York

PETER BOWER, PhD

National Primary Care Research & Development Centre, University of Manchester

PAULA WHITTY, MD, FFPH

Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

Correspondence: Dr Simon Gilbody, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York YO10 6DD, UK. Tel: +44 (0)1904 321370; fax: +44 (0)1904 321388; email: sg519{at}york.ac.uk

Declaration of interest None.

Background A number of enhancement strategies have been proposed to improve the quality and outcome of care for depression in primary care settings. Decision-makers are likely to need to know whether these interventions are cost-effective in routine primary care settings.

Method We conducted a systematic review of all full economic evaluations (cost-effectiveness and cost–utility analyses) accompanying randomised controlled trials of enhanced primary care for depression. Costs were standardised to UKpounds/US dollars and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were visually summarised using a permutation matrix.

Results We identified 11 full economic evaluations (4757 patients). A near-uniform finding was that the interventions based upon collaborative care/case management resulted in improved outcomes but were also associated with greater costs. When considering primary care depression treatment costs alone, ICER estimates ranged from £7 ($13, no confidence interval given) to £13 ($24,95% CI –105 to 148) per additional depression-free day. Educational interventions alone were associated with increased cost and no clinical benefit.

Conclusions Improved outcomes through depression management programmes using a collaborative care/case management approach can be expected, but are associated with increased cost and will require investment.


Related articles in BJP:

PETER TYRER
BJP 2006 189: 390. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
I. Anderson, I. Ferrier, R. Baldwin, P. Cowen, L Howard, G Lewis, K Matthews, R. McAllister-Williams, R. Peveler, J Scott, et al.
Evidence-based guidelines for treating depressive disorders with antidepressants: A revision of the 2000 British Association for Psychopharmacology guidelines
J Psychopharmacol, June 1, 2008; 22(4): 343 - 396.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
M. E. Domino, B. J. Burns, S. G. Silva, C. J. Kratochvil, B. Vitiello, M. A. Reinecke, J. Mario, and J. S. March
Cost-Effectiveness of Treatments for Adolescent Depression: Results From TADS
Am J Psychiatry, May 1, 2008; 165(5): 588 - 596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
P. S. Wang, G. E. Simon, J. Avorn, F. Azocar, E. J. Ludman, J. McCulloch, M. Z. Petukhova, and R. C. Kessler
Telephone Screening, Outreach, and Care Management for Depressed Workers and Impact on Clinical and Work Productivity Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JAMA, September 26, 2007; 298(12): 1401 - 1411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Ment. HealthHome page
S. A. Joseph
Review: enhanced primary care programmes are effective for people with depression but are associated with increased healthcare costs
Evid. Based Ment. Health, May 1, 2007; 10(2): 48 - 48.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Ment. HealthHome page
D. S. M Gilbody
IMPACT collaborative care programme reduces suicide ideation in depressed older adults
Evid. Based Ment. Health, May 1, 2007; 10(2): 51 - 51.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
S. Gilbody, P. Bower, J. Fletcher, D. Richards, and A. J. Sutton
Collaborative Care for Depression: A Cumulative Meta-analysis and Review of Longer-term Outcomes
Arch Intern Med, November 27, 2006; 166(21): 2314 - 2321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.