The British Journal of Psychiatry (2006) 189: 346-353. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.105.017251
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DIKEOS, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by SHAM, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DIKEOS, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by SHAM, P. C.

Distribution of symptom dimensions across Kraepelinian divisions

DIMITRIS G. DIKEOS, MD

Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, UK and Department of Psychiatry, University of Athens, Greece

HARVEY WICKHAM, MD, MRCPsych, FRSS

Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, UK

COLM McDONALD, MD, MRCPsych, PhD

Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, UK and Department of Psychiatry, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland

MURIEL WALSHE, BA

Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, UK

THORDUR SIGMUNDSSON, MD, MRCPsych

Department of Psychiatry, Landspitalinn, The University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland

ELVIRA BRAMON, MD, PhD

Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, UK

ANTON GRECH, MD, MSc, MRCPsych

Mount Carmel Hospital, Attard, Malta

TIMOTHEA TOULOPOULOU, BA, MSc, PhD

Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, UK

ROBIN MURRAY, MD, DSc

Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, UK

PAK C. SHAM, MD, MRCPsych, PhD

Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, UK and Department of Psychiatry, University of Hong Kong

Correspondence: Dr Dimitris G. Dikeos, Institute of Psychiatry, SGDP Building, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF, UK. Tel: +44(0)20 7848 0854; email d.dikeos{at}iop.kcl.ac.uk

Declaration of interest None. Funding detailed in Acknowledgements.

Background Dimensional structures are established for many psychiatric diagnoses, but dimensions have not been compared between diagnostic groups.

Aims To examine the structure of dimensionsin psychosis, to analyse their correlations with disease characteristics and to assess the relative contribution of dimensions v. diagnosis in explaining these characteristics.

Method Factor analysis of the OPCRIT items of 191 Maudsley Family Study patients with schizophrenia, mood disorders with psychosis, schizoaffective disorder, and other psychotic illnesses, followed by regression of disease characteristics from factor scores and diagnosis.

Results Five factors were identified (mania, reality distortion, depression, disorganisation, negative); all were more variable in schizophrenia than in affective psychosis. Mania was the best discriminator between schizophrenia and affective psychosis; the negative factor was strongly correlated with poor premorbid functioning, insidious onset and worse course. Dimensions explained more of the disease characteristics than did diagnosis, but the explanatory power of the latter was also high.

Conclusions Kraepelinian diagnostic categories suffice for understanding illness characteristics, but the use of dimensions adds substantial information.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
E. Vassos, P. C. Sham, G. Cai, H. Deng, X. Liu, X. Sun, J. Zhao, R. M. Murray, D. A. Collier, and T. Li
Correlation and familial aggregation of dimensions of psychosis in affected sibling pairs from China
The British Journal of Psychiatry, October 1, 2008; 193(4): 305 - 310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
P. Tyrer
From the Editor's desk
The British Journal of Psychiatry, September 1, 2008; 193(3): 266 - 266.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Schizophr BullHome page
E. Ivleva, G. Thaker, and C. A. Tamminga
Comparing Genes and Phenomenology in the Major Psychoses: Schizophrenia and Bipolar 1 Disorder
Schizophr Bull, July 1, 2008; 34(4): 734 - 742.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Schizophr BullHome page
J. Allardyce, W. Gaebel, J. Zielasek, and J. van Os
Deconstructing Psychosis Conference February 2006: The Validity of Schizophrenia and Alternative Approaches to the Classification of Psychosis
Schizophr Bull, July 1, 2007; 33(4): 863 - 867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Schizophr BullHome page
R. Dutta, T. Greene, J. Addington, K. McKenzie, M. Phillips, and R. M. Murray
Biological, Life Course, and Cross-Cultural Studies All point Toward the Value of Dimensional and Developmental Ratings in the Classification of Psychosis
Schizophr Bull, July 1, 2007; 33(4): 868 - 876.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
N. Craddock, M. C. O'Donovan, and M. J. Owen
Symptom dimensions and the Kraepelinian dichotomy
The British Journal of Psychiatry, April 1, 2007; 190(4): 361 - 361.
[Full Text] [PDF]