|
|
|||||||||||
Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, UK and Department of Psychiatry, University of Athens, Greece
Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, UK
Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, UK and Department of Psychiatry, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, UK
Department of Psychiatry, Landspitalinn, The University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, UK
Mount Carmel Hospital, Attard, Malta
Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, UK
Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, UK
Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, UK and Department of Psychiatry, University of Hong Kong
Correspondence: Dr Dimitris G. Dikeos, Institute of Psychiatry, SGDP Building, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF, UK. Tel: +44(0)20 7848 0854; email d.dikeos{at}iop.kcl.ac.uk
Declaration of interest None. Funding detailed in Acknowledgements.
Background Dimensional structures are established for many psychiatric diagnoses, but dimensions have not been compared between diagnostic groups.
Aims To examine the structure of dimensionsin psychosis, to analyse their correlations with disease characteristics and to assess the relative contribution of dimensions v. diagnosis in explaining these characteristics.
Method Factor analysis of the OPCRIT items of 191 Maudsley Family Study patients with schizophrenia, mood disorders with psychosis, schizoaffective disorder, and other psychotic illnesses, followed by regression of disease characteristics from factor scores and diagnosis.
Results Five factors were identified (mania, reality distortion, depression, disorganisation, negative); all were more variable in schizophrenia than in affective psychosis. Mania was the best discriminator between schizophrenia and affective psychosis; the negative factor was strongly correlated with poor premorbid functioning, insidious onset and worse course. Dimensions explained more of the disease characteristics than did diagnosis, but the explanatory power of the latter was also high.
Conclusions Kraepelinian diagnostic categories suffice for understanding illness characteristics, but the use of dimensions adds substantial information.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Ivleva, G. Thaker, and C. A. Tamminga Comparing Genes and Phenomenology in the Major Psychoses: Schizophrenia and Bipolar 1 Disorder Schizophr Bull, July 1, 2008; 34(4): 734 - 742. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Allardyce, W. Gaebel, J. Zielasek, and J. van Os Deconstructing Psychosis Conference February 2006: The Validity of Schizophrenia and Alternative Approaches to the Classification of Psychosis Schizophr Bull, July 1, 2007; 33(4): 863 - 867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Dutta, T. Greene, J. Addington, K. McKenzie, M. Phillips, and R. M. Murray Biological, Life Course, and Cross-Cultural Studies All point Toward the Value of Dimensional and Developmental Ratings in the Classification of Psychosis Schizophr Bull, July 1, 2007; 33(4): 868 - 876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Craddock, M. C. O'Donovan, and M. J. Owen Symptom dimensions and the Kraepelinian dichotomy The British Journal of Psychiatry, April 1, 2007; 190(4): 361 - 361. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Psychiatric Bulletin | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |