BJP CPD Online e-learning site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The British Journal of Psychiatry (2006) 189: 354-360. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.105.017913
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in BJP
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ELBOGEN, E. B.
Right arrow Articles by MONAHAN, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ELBOGEN, E. B.
Right arrow Articles by MONAHAN, J.

Treatment engagement and violence risk in mental disorders

ERIC B. ELBOGEN, PhD, RICHARD A. VAN DORN, PhD, JEFFREY W. SWANSON, PhD and MARVIN S. SWARTZ, MD

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

JOHN MONAHAN, PhD

University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA

Correspondence: Dr Eric Elbogen, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC 3071, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Tel: +1 919 682 8394; email: eric.elbogen{at}duke.edu

Declaration of interest None. Funding detailed in Acknowledgements.

Background Research has uncovered many characteristics related to violence committed by people with mentalillness. However, relatively few studies have focused on understanding the connection between violence and dynamic, malleable variables such as a patient’s level of treatment engagement.

Aims To explore the link between community violence and patients’beliefs about psychiatric treatment benefit.

Method A sample of 1011 adults receiving out-patienttreatment for a psychiatric disorder in the public mental health systems of five US states were interviewed.

Results Bivariate analyses revealed community violence was inversely related to treatment adherence, perceived treatment need and perceived treatment effectiveness. Multivariate analyses showed these three variables were associated with reduced odds of violent and other aggressive acts.

Conclusions The results suggest clinical consideration of patients’ perceptions of treatment benefit can help enhance violence risk assessment in psychiatric practice settings.


Related articles in BJP:

PETER TYRER
BJP 2006 189: 390. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
E. F. Torrey, J. Stanley, J. Monahan, H. J. Steadman, and MacArthur Study Group
The MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study Revisited: Two Views Ten Years After Its Initial Publication
Psychiatr Serv, February 1, 2008; 59(2): 147 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
A. Buchanan
Risk of Violence by Psychiatric Patients: Beyond the "Actuarial Versus Clinical" Assessment Debate
Psychiatr Serv, February 1, 2008; 59(2): 184 - 190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
I. Kooyman, K. Dean, S. Harvey, and E. Walsh
Outcomes of public concern in schizophrenia
The British Journal of Psychiatry, August 1, 2007; 191(50): s29 - s36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Treatment engagement and violence risk in mental disorders
Arpan Dutta
BJP Online, 3 Nov 2006 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.