The British Journal of Psychiatry (2006) 189: 494-501. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.105.014571
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simon, J.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simon, J.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, D.

Treatment options in moderate and severe depression: decision analysis supporting a clinical guideline

Judit Simon, MD, MSc

Health Economics Research Centre, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford and National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (NCCMH), Centre for Outcomes, Research and Effectiveness, Sub-department of Clinical Psychology, University College London

Stephen Pilling, MSc, NCCMH

Centre for Outcomes, Research and Effectiveness, Sub-department of Clinical Psychology, University College London and Camden and Islington Mental Health and Social Care Trust, London

Rachel Burbeck, MSc, NCCMH

Royal College of Psychiatrists’ Research Unit, London

David Goldberg, MD, FRCP

Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College, London, UK

Correspondence: Dr Judit Simon, Health Economics Research Centre, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK. Tel: +44 (0) 1865 226692; fax: +44 (0) 1865 226842; email: judit.simon{at}dphpc.ox.ac.uk

Declaration of interest None. Funding detailed in Acknowledgements.

Background Treatment options for depression include antidepressants, psychological therapy and a combination of the two.

Aims To develop cost-effective clinical guidelines.

Method Systematic literature reviews were used to identify clinical, utility and cost data. A decision analysis was then conducted to compare the benefits and costs of antidepressants with combination therapy for moderate and severe depression in secondary care in the UK.

Results Over the 15-month analysis period, combination therapy resulted in higher costs and an expected 0.16 increase per person in the probability of remission and no relapse compared with antidepressants. The cost per additional successfully treated patient was £4056 (95% CI1400–18300); the cost per quality-adjusted life year gained was £5777 (95% CI1900–33 800) for severe depression and £14 540 (95% CI 4800–79 400) for moderate depression.

Conclusions Combination therapy is likely to be a cost-effective first-line secondary care treatment for severe depression. Its cost-effectiveness for moderate depression is more uncertain from current evidence. Targeted combination therapy could improve resource utilisation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
C. J. Harmer, G. M. Goodwin, and P. J. Cowen
Why do antidepressants take so long to work? A cognitive neuropsychological model of antidepressant drug action
The British Journal of Psychiatry, August 1, 2009; 195(2): 102 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Confusion of treatment options for depression
Alastair M Hull, et al.
BJP Online, 18 Dec 2006 [Full text]