© 2007 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
REVIEW ARTICLES |
Bias in psychiatric case–control studies
Literature survey
Academic Department of Psychological Medicine
Health Services Research
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Health Services Resarch
Section of Epidemiology
Academic Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
Correspondence: Professor Matthew Hotopf, Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Weston Education Centre, 10 Cutcombe Rd, London SE5 9RJ, UK. Email:m.hotopf{at}iop.kcl.ac.uk
Background: Case–control studies are vulnerable to selection and information biases which may generate misleading findings.
Aims To assess the quality of methodological reporting of case–control studies published in general psychiatric journals.
Method All the case–control studies published over a 2-year period in the six general psychiatric journals with impact factors of more than 3 were assessed by a group of psychiatrists with training in epidemiology using a structured assessment devised for the purpose. The measured study quality was compared across type of exposure and journal.
Results The reporting of methods in the 408 identified papers was generally poor, with basic information about recruitment of participants often absent. Reduction of selection bias was described best in the `pencil and paper' studies and worst in the genetic studies. Neuroimaging studies reported the most safeguards against information bias. Measurement of exposure was reported least well in studies determining the exposure with a biological test.
Conclusions Poor reporting of recruitment strategies threatens the validity of reported results and reduces the generalisability of studies.
Related articles in BJP:
- From the Editor's desk
- Peter Tyrer
BJP 2007 190: 282.[Full Text] - Highlights of this issue
- Sukhwinder S. Shergill
BJP 2007 190: A9.[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  M. Muller and M. Egger Strengthening the reporting of observational epidemiology (STROBE) in sexual health Sex Transm Inf, June 1, 2009; 85(3): 162 - 164. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Little, J. P.T. Higgins, J. P.A. Ioannidis, D. Moher, F. Gagnon, E. von Elm, M. J. Khoury, B. Cohen, G. Davey-Smith, J. Grimshaw, et al. STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA): An Extension of the STROBE Statement Ann Intern Med, February 3, 2009; 150(3): 206 - 215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. J. Knol, J. P. Vandenbroucke, P. Scott, and M. Egger What Do Case-Control Studies Estimate? Survey of Methods and Assumptions in Published Case-Control Research Am. J. Epidemiol., November 1, 2008; 168(9): 1073 - 1081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Mackin and P. Gallagher Authors' reply The British Journal of Psychiatry, December 1, 2007; 191(6): 564 - 564. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. v. Elm, D. G Altman, M. Egger, S. J Pocock, P. C Gotzsche, J. P Vandenbroucke, and STROBE Initiative Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies BMJ, October 20, 2007; 335(7624): 806 - 808. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. von Elm, D. G. Altman, M. Egger, S. J. Pocock, P. C. Gotzsche, J. P. Vandenbroucke, and for the STROBE Initiative The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies Ann Intern Med, October 16, 2007; 147(8): 573 - 577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
eLetters:
Read all eLetters
- Design issues in case-control studies
- K. S. Jacob
- BJP Online, 28 Mar 2007 [Full text]