Department of Mental Health Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London
Camden Mental Health Consortium, London
Department of Mental Health Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London
Health Sciences Research Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry
Department of Mental Health Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, UK
Correspondence: Professor Michael King, Department of Mental Health Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 4QP, UK. Tel: +44 (0)20 7830 2397; email: m.king{at}medsch.ucl.ac.uk
Background There is concern about the stigma of mental illness, but it is difficult to measure stigma consistently.
Aims To develop a standardised instrument to measure the stigma of mental illness.
Method We used qualitative data from interviews with mental health service users to develop a pilot scale with 42 items. We recruited 193 service users in order to standardise the scale. Of these, 93 were asked to complete the questionnaire twice, 2 weeks apart, of whom 60 (65%) did so. Items with a testretest reliability kappa coefficient of 0.4 or greater were retained and subjected to common factor analysis.
Results The final 28-item stigma scale has a three-factor structure: the first concerns discrimination, the second disclosure and the third potential positive aspects of mental illness. Stigma scale scores were negatively correlated with global self-esteem.
Conclusions This self-report questionnaire, which can be completed in 510 min, may help us understand more about the role of stigma of psychiatric illness in research and clinical settings.
Related articles in BJP:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Ali, A. Strydom, A. Hassiotis, R. Williams, and M. King A measure of perceived stigma in people with intellectual disability The British Journal of Psychiatry, November 1, 2008; 193(5): 410 - 415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Haghighat Measuring stigma The British Journal of Psychiatry, October 1, 2007; 191(4): 363 - 364. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all eLetters