The British Journal of Psychiatry (2007) 190: s15-s19. doi: 10.1192/bjp.190.5.s15
© 2007 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duggan, C.
Right arrow Articles by Milton, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Duggan, C.
Right arrow Articles by Milton, J.

Value of standard personality assessments in informing clinical decision – making in a medium secure unit

Conor Duggan, FRCPsych

Section of Forensic Mental Health, University of Nottingham

Lauren Mason, BSc

Arnold Lodge, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust

Penny Banerjee, MRCPsych

Arnold Lodge, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust

John Milton, MRCPsych

Rampton Hospital, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust

Correspondence: Professor Conor Duggan, Arnold Lodge RSU, Cordelia Close, Leicester LE5 0LE, UK. Email: conor.duggan{at}nottshc.nhs.uk

Declaration of interest None.

Background Assessing those with personality disorder for treatment in secure settings is known to be unsatisfactory.

Aim To examine the utility of a standardised assessment of offenders with personality disorder referred for treatment in secure care in a naturalistic study.

Method A consecutive series of 89 men were assessed with a battery of four recommended instruments measuring personality and risk. Decisions on whether or not to admit were based on a multidisciplinary discussion informed by these assessments.

Results Of the 89 comprehensively assessed referrals, 60 (67%) were offered admission. High scores on the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (especially on Factor 1) was the only measure that was associated with rejection. Of 44 patients discharged, 29 (66%) failed to complete treatment; none of the pre-admission assessments distinguished `completers' from `non-completers'. Although skills were acquired on the unit, follow-up of 24 men in the community showed that this had only a marginal effect on re-offending rate (58%).

Conclusions Current recommended assessment methods appear unsatisfactory in identifying those who either (a) complete treatment or (b) benefit from treatment. Our results throw doubt on their value.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
P. E. Mullen
Dangerous and severe personality disorder and in need of treatment
The British Journal of Psychiatry, May 1, 2007; 190(49): s3 - s7.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]