The British Journal of Psychiatry (2007) 190: s66-s74. doi: 10.1192/bjp.190.5.s66
© 2007 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wong, S. C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Gu, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wong, S. C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Gu, D.

Assessment and treatment of violence–prone forensic clients: an integrated approach

Stephen C. P. Wong, PhD, Audrey Gordon, MEdPsy and Deqiang Gu, PhD

Regional Psychiatric Centre and University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Correspondence: Dr Stephen C. P. Wong, Research Unit, Regional Psychiatric Centre, Box 9243, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7K 3X5, Canada. Email: s.wong{at}sasktel.net

Declaration of interest S.C.P.W. and A.G. are proprietors of VRS and VRP.

1 Because of increasing needs for such services, changes are underway to admit to this programme more patients with major mental illnesses linked to violence.

Background A risk-reduction treatment programme complemented by a focused assessment, both guided by the risk-need-responsivity principles, is suggested as the preferred treatment for violence-prone individuals with personality disorder.

Aims Violence Reduction Programme (VRP) and Violence Risk Scale (VRS) were used to illustrate the design and implementation of such an approach. Participants from a similarly designed Aggressive Behaviour Control Programme were used to illustrate the principles discussed and to test programme efficacy.

Method The VRS was used to assess risk/need and treatment readiness, and DSM-III/IV psychiatric diagnoses of 203 federal offenders.

Results Participants had a high probability of violent recidivism and many violence-linked criminogenic needs, similar to offenders with high PCL-R scores. Most had antisocial personality disorder and substance use disorders; in terms of treatment-readiness, most were in the contemplation stage of change. Outcome evaluation results support the objectives of the VRP.

Conclusions Integrating risk-need-responsivity principles in assessment and treatment can provide useful guidelines for intervention with violence-prone forensic clients with personality disorder.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
P. Tyrer
From the Editor's desk
The British Journal of Psychiatry, August 1, 2008; 193(2): 178 - 178.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
P. E. Mullen
Dangerous and severe personality disorder and in need of treatment
The British Journal of Psychiatry, May 1, 2007; 190(49): s3 - s7.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]