University of Manchester
University of Cambridge
Imperial College, London
Institute of Psychiatry, London
University of Manchester
Imperial College, London, UK
the CUtLASS team
Correspondence: Linda Davies, Division of Psychiatry, University of Manchester, Rawnsley Building, MRI, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK. Tel: +44 (0) 161 276 5380; email: Linda.davies{at}manchester.ac.uk
Declaration of interest Funding from the Secretary of State for Health (UK). The authors have received consultancy fees, honoraria or departmental support from the pharmaceutical industry, including Novartis, BMS Otsuka, Janssen Cilag, Servier, BMS, Astra-Zeneca, Sanofi-Synthelabo, Eli Lilly and Johnson & Johnson. F.G. is related to an employee of Eli Lilly & Co.
Background There are claims that the extra costs of atypical (second-generation) antipsychotic drugs over conventional (first-generation) drugs are offset by improved health-related quality of life.
Aims To determine the relative costs and value of treatment with conventional or atypical antipsychotics in people with schizophrenia.
Method Cost-effectiveness acceptability analysis integrated clinical and economic randomised controlled trial data of conventional and atypical antipsychotics in routine practice.
Results Conventional antipsychotics had lower costs and higher quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) than atypical antipsychotics and were more than 50% likely to be cost-effective.
Conclusions The primary and sensitivity analyses indicated that conventional antipsychotics may be cost-saving and associated with a gain in QALYs compared with atypical antipsychotics.
Related articles in BJP:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Parks, A. Radke, G. Parker, M.-E. Foti, R. Eilers, M. Diamond, D. Svendsen, and R. Tandon Principles of Antipsychotic Prescribing for Policy Makers, Circa 2008. Translating Knowledge to Promote Individualized Treatment Schizophr Bull, September 1, 2009; 35(5): 931 - 936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Rosenheck and M. J. Sernyak Developing A Policy For Second-Generation Antipsychotic Drugs Health Aff., September 1, 2009; 28(5): w782 - w793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. C. Alexander and R. S. Stafford Does Comparative Effectiveness Have a Comparative Edge? JAMA, June 17, 2009; 301(23): 2488 - 2490. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Barrett and S. Byford Economic evaluations in evidence based healthcare Evid. Based Ment. Health, May 1, 2009; 12(2): 36 - 39. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Tyrer So careless of the single trial Evid. Based Ment. Health, August 1, 2008; 11(3): 65 - 66. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Scott Cognitive-behavioural therapy for severe mental disorders: back to the future? The British Journal of Psychiatry, June 1, 2008; 192(6): 401 - 403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Tyrer From the Editor's desk The British Journal of Psychiatry, June 1, 2008; 192(6): 482 - 482. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Domino and M. S. Swartz Who Are the New Users of Antipsychotic Medications? Psychiatr Serv, May 1, 2008; 59(5): 507 - 514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Rosenheck, D. L. Leslie, and J. A. Doshi Second-Generation Antipsychotics: Cost-Effectiveness, Policy Options, and Political Decision Making Psychiatr Serv, May 1, 2008; 59(5): 515 - 520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lewis and J. Lieberman CATIE and CUtLASS: can we handle the truth? The British Journal of Psychiatry, March 1, 2008; 192(3): 161 - 163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all eLetters