The British Journal of Psychiatry (2007) 191: 75-81. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.030262
© 2007 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in BJP
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bögner, D.
Right arrow Articles by Brewin, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bögner, D.
Right arrow Articles by Brewin, C. R.

Impact of sexual violence on disclosure during Home Office interviews

Diana Bögner, BSc, DClinPsych, CPsychol

North London Forensic Service, London

Jane Herlihy, MPhil, DClinPsych, CPsychol

Trauma Clinic, London, Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Bristol

Chris R. Brewin, BA, MSc, PhD, FBPsS

Subdepartment of Clinical Health Psychology, University College London, UK

Correspondence: Dr Diana Bögner, North London Forensic Service, Camlet Lodge Regional Secure Unit, Chase Farm Hospital Site, The Ridgeway, Enfield EN2 8JL, UK. Email: dianabogner{at}hotmail.com

Declaration of interest None.

Funding detailed in Acknowledgements.

Background Late disclosure or non-disclosure during Home Office interviews is commonly cited as a reason to doubt an asylum seeker's credibility, but disclosure may be affected by other factors.

Aims To determine whether and how sexual violence affects asylum seekers' disclosure of personal information during Home Office interviews.

Method Twenty-seven refugees and asylum seekers were interviewed using semi-structured interviews and self-report measures.

Results The majority of participants reported difficulties in disclosing. Those with a history of sexual violence reported more difficulties in disclosing personal information during Home Office interviews, were more likely to dissociate during these interviews and scored significantly higher on measures of post-traumatic stress symptoms and shame than those with a history of non-sexual violence.

Conclusions The results indicate the importance of shame, dissociation and psychopathology in disclosure and support the need for immigration procedures sensitive to these issues. Judgments that late disclosure is indicative of a fabricated asylum claim must take into account the possibility of factors related to sexual violence and the circumstances of the interview process itself.


Related articles in BJP:

Highlights of this issue
Sukhwinder S. Shergill
BJP 2007 191: A2. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Refugee StudiesHome page
L. Berg and J. Millbank
Constructing the Personal Narratives of Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Asylum Claimants
Journal of Refugee Studies, June 1, 2009; 22(2): 195 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
J. Herlihy and S. W. Turner
Asylum claims and memory of trauma: sharing our knowledge
The British Journal of Psychiatry, July 1, 2007; 191(1): 3 - 4.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]