The British Journal of Psychiatry (2007) 191: 415-419. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.030007
© 2007 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in BJP
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BOISJOLI, R.
Right arrow Articles by TREMBLAY, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BOISJOLI, R.
Right arrow Articles by TREMBLAY, R. E.

Impact and clinical significance of a preventive intervention for disruptive boys

15-year follow-up

RACHEL BOISJOLI, BSc, FRANK VITARO, PhD and ÉRIC LACOURSE, PhD

Research Unit on Children’s Psychosocial Maladjustment, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

EDWARD D. BARKER, PhD

Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK

RICHARD E. TREMBLAY, PhD

Research Unit on Children’s Psychosocial Maladjustment, University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Correspondence: Rachel Boisjoli, Research Unit on Children’s Psychosocial Maladjustment, University of Montreal, 3050 Édouard-Montpetit Boulevard, Montreal, Quebec H3T 1J7, Canada. Email: rachel.boisjoli{at}umontreal.ca

Declaration of interest None.

Background Many intervention programmes have attempted to reduce disruptive behaviour problems during early childhood to prevent maladjustment during adolescence and adulthood.

Aims To assess the long-term impact and clinical significance of a 2-year multicomponent preventive intervention on criminal behaviour and academic achievement, using intention-to-treat analyses.

Method Targeted disruptive–aggressive boys considered to be at risk of later criminality and low school achievement (n=250), identified from a community sample (n=895), were randomly allocated to an intervention or a control group. The rest of the sample (n=645) served as the low-risk group. The intervention was multimodal and aimed at boys, parents and teachers. Official data measured both outcomes.

Results Significantly more boys in the intervention group (13%; P<0.05) completed high-school graduation and generally fewer (11%; P=0.06) had a criminal record compared with those allocated to the control group.

Conclusions The results suggest that early preventive intervention for those at high risk of antisocial behaviour is likely to benefit both the individuals concerned and society.


Related articles in BJP:

Highlights of this issue
SUKHWINDER S. SHERGILL
BJP 2007 191: 373-a17-373. [Full Text]  

PETER TYRER
BJP 2007 191: 470. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
L. S. Pagani, J. L. Derevensky, and C. Japel
Predicting Gambling Behavior in Sixth Grade From Kindergarten Impulsivity: A Tale of Developmental Continuity
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, March 1, 2009; 163(3): 238 - 243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]