BJP CPD Online e-learning site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The British Journal of Psychiatry (2007) 191: s64-s70. doi: 10.1192/bjp.191.50.s64
© 2007 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamer, S.
Right arrow Articles by Haddad, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hamer, S.
Right arrow Articles by Haddad, P. M.

REVIEW ARTICLES

Adverse effects of antipsychotics as outcome measures

Samantha Hamer, MRCPsych

Bolton, Salford and Trafford Mental Health NHS Trust

Peter M. Haddad, MRCPsych, MD

Bolton, Salford and Trafford Mental Health NHS Trust, and Department of Psychiatry, University of Manchester, UK

Correspondence: Dr P. M. Haddad, Cromwell House, Cromwell Road, Eccles, Salford, Manchester M30 0GT, UK. Email: peter.haddad{at}bstmht.nhs.uk

Declaration of interest P.M.H. has received honoraria from several pharmaceutical companies.

Background Antipsychotic drugs are associated with adverse effects that can lead to poor medication adherence, stigma, distress and impaired quality of life.

Aims To review the use of adverse effects of antipsychotic drugs as outcome measures, with a particular emphasis on methodological issues.

Method Review of data on adverse effects from sources including randomised controlled trials (RCTs), post-marketing surveillance and naturalistic studies.

Results All have advantages and disadvantages and the best overview comes from considering all sources of data together. Adverse effects are inconsistently reported, hampering cross-study comparisons. Many outcome measures lack clinical meaning. In both naturalistic studies and RCTs adverse effects often account for less treatment discontinuation than lack of efficacy.

Conclusions Standardisation in the reporting of adverse effects is needed. Patients' subjective experience of medication should be given more consideration. Total discontinuation rates provide a useful global outcome measure that incorporates tolerability and efficacy as well as patient and clinician viewpoints. Patients should be informed of common side-effects prior to treatment and monitored for their occurrence during treatment.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
P. Tyrer
From the Editor's desk
The British Journal of Psychiatry, May 1, 2008; 192(5): 400 - 400.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
T. Burns
Evolution of outcome measures in schizophrenia
The British Journal of Psychiatry, August 1, 2007; 191(50): s1 - s6.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2007 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.