The British Journal of Psychiatry (2008) 192: 52-58. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.032532
© 2008 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. B. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kobak, K. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. B. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kobak, K. A.

Development and reliability of a structured interview guide for the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (SIGMA)

Janet B. W. Williams, DSW

Biometrics Research Unit, Columbia University, New York, New York

Kenneth A. Kobak, PhD

MedAvante, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA

Correspondence: Janet B. W. Williams, MedAvante, Inc., 100 American Metro Blvd., Suite 106, Hamilton, NJ 08619, USA. Email: jwilliams{at}medavante.net

Declaration of interest

None. Funding detailed in Acknowledgements.

Background

The Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is often used in clinical trials to select patients and to assess treatment efficacy. The scale was originally published without suggested questions for clinicians to use in gathering the information necessary to rate the items. Structured and semi-structured interview guides have been found to improve reliability with other scales.

Aims

To describe the development and test–retest reliability of a structured interview guide for the MADRS (SIGMA).

Method

A total of 162 test–retest interviews were conducted by 81 rater pairs. Each patient was interviewed twice, once by each rater conducting an independent interview.

Results

The intraclass correlation for total score between raters using the SIGMA was r=0.93, P<0.0001. All ten items had good to excellent interrater reliability.

Conclusions

Use of the SIGMA can result in high reliability of MADRS scores in evaluating patients with depression.