BJP Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The British Journal of Psychiatry (2008) 192: 130-134. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.032078
© 2008 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in BJP
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mackinnon, A.
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mackinnon, A.
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, H.

Comparative randomised trial of online cognitive–behavioural therapy and an information website for depression: 12-month outcomes

Andrew Mackinnon, PhD, Kathleen M. Griffiths, PhD and Helen Christensen, PhD

Centre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia

Correspondence: Andrew Mackinnon, Centre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 0200, Australia. Email: Andrew.Mackinnon{at}anu.edu.au

Declaration of interest

H.C. and K.G. are authors and developers of the MoodGYM and BluePages websites but derive no personal or financial benefit from their operation. Funding detailed in Acknowledgements.

Background

An earlier paper reported positive outcomes immediately following access to a cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) internet intervention and a depression information website.

Aims

To determine 6-month and 12-month outcomes of the interventions relative to a placebo control condition.

Method

Participants allocated to the depression information website condition, the CBT internet intervention and the placebo control condition were followed up at 6 and 12 months by survey. The primary outcome measure was the Center for Epidemiologic Studies – Depression (CES–D) scale. Of 525 participants recruited, 79% completed their assigned intervention and 60% were retained at 12-month follow-up. Attrition was handled using mixed-model repeated-measures ANOVA.

Results

Both the CBT site and depression information sites were associated with statistically significant benefits in CES–D score reduction compared with controls at post-test. At 6-months follow-up, the reduction seen for the people allocated to the CBT arm remained significant, whereas that for the depression information website arm was not. At 12 months, both active interventions were statistically significantly superior to the control condition.

Conclusions

There is some evidence that benefits of these brief internet interventions are retained beyond their endpoint. The impact of human support provided by interviewers in the trial must be considered when comparing these outcomes to routine use of both internet interventions.


Related articles in BJP:

Highlights of this issue
Kimberlie Dean
BJP 2008 192: A6. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
G. Andersson and P. Cuijpers
Pros and cons of online cognitive-behavioural therapy
The British Journal of Psychiatry, October 1, 2008; 193(4): 270 - 271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2008 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.