HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter View responses Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in BJP Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Goldberg, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Goldberg, D.

Improved investment in mental health services: value for money?

Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK. Email: spjudpb{at}hotmail.com

Declaration of interest

None.

Background

This paper examines what has been achieved in the specialist mental health services by the vastly increased health expenditures that the National Health Service (NHS) has enjoyed in the past 5 years.

Aims

To describe the way money has been spent in specialist mental health services and examine why problems remain after such admirable changes to already available resources.

Method

Changes in staff employed by mental health services, where the extra staff are deployed, and patterns of expenditure within the whole service and within community mental health teams are examined.

Results

Some of the new expenditure has been well spent, and has produced improvements in the service. However, one must also take account of the costs of the greatly increased numbers of managers, who impose two sorts of costs: that of their own salaries, and the opportunity costs of front-line staff having to attend meetings and write reports rather than seeing patients. Throughout the rest of the NHS, money has been wasted on needless reorganisations, on consultant and general practitioner contracts, and on information technology that has so far failed to deliver tangible advantages.

Conclusions

The emphasis on central control undermines local initiatives and wastes resources. Some central control is inevitable, but policies need to be developed in collaboration with clinicians. At local level, expenditure by primary care trusts and mental health trusts also needs to be scrutinised by committees that should include representatives of front-line mental health staff.

Related articles in BJP:

From the Editor's desk

Peter Tyrer
BJP 2008 192: 160. [Full Text]  

Highlights of this issue

Kimberlie Dean
BJP 2008 192: A6. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Anderson New Ways of Working Psychiatr. Bull., May 1, 2008; 32(5): 195 - 195. [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters: