The British Journal of Psychiatry (2008) 192: 326-330. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.046961
© 2008 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in BJP
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Summerfield, D.
Right arrow Articles by Veale, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Summerfield, D.
Right arrow Articles by Veale, D.

IN DEBATE

Proposals for massive expansion of psychological therapies would be counterproductive across society{dagger}

Derek Summerfield, MRCPsych

Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, UK. Email: derek.summerfield{at}slam.nhs.uk

David Veale, FRCPsych

South London and Maudsley Trust, and Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, UK. Email: david{at}veale.co.uk

Declaration of interest

D.S.: none / D.V.: none.

{dagger} See invited commentary pp. 331–332, this issue

In 2007 the UK Government announced a substantial expansion of funding for psychological therapies in England to provide better support for people with conditions such as anxiety and depression. Will these services result in the medicalisation of normal distress? Or are they simply an evidenced-based solution for a previously unmet need? In this debate Derek Summerfield and David Veale discuss the issues raised by these controversial proposals


Related articles in BJP:

Invited commentary on... Proposals for massive expansion of psychological therapies would be counterproductive across society
Michael King
BJP 2008 192: 331-332. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Highlights of this issue
Sukhwinder S. Shergill
BJP 2008 192: A18. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
S. A. Mushtaq
Expansion of psychological therapies
The British Journal of Psychiatry, September 1, 2008; 193(3): 256 - 256.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
S. Rathod, F. Naeem, P. Phiri, and D. Kingdon
Expansion of psychological therapies
The British Journal of Psychiatry, September 1, 2008; 193(3): 256 - 257.
[Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Individual solutions to political problems?
James A Rodger
BJP Online, 28 May 2008 [Full text]
Both are right
Paul Hutton
BJP Online, 28 May 2008 [Full text]
Expansion of psychological therapies is long due
Dr Salman A Mushtaq
BJP Online, 28 May 2008 [Full text]
Cultural Adaptation of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Shanaya Rathod, et al.
BJP Online, 28 May 2008 [Full text]
CBT: something (evidenced-based) is better than nothing.
Rais I Ahmed, et al.
BJP Online, 11 Jun 2008 [Full text]
Response by author
derek a summerfield
BJP Online, 11 Jun 2008 [Full text]
Re: Response by author-Cultural Adaptation of CBT
Shanaya Rathod, et al.
BJP Online, 2 Jul 2008 [Full text]
Clinical Psychology Training
Jenny Taylor
BJP Online, 13 Jul 2008 [Full text]