Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
Department of Psychiatry, University of Bonn, Germany
Laboratory of Psychiatric Genetics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poland
i
, PhD
Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia
Central Institute of Mental Health, Division of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Mannheim, Germany
Centre for Psychiatric Research, Aarhus University Hospital, Risskov, Denmark
Croatian Institute for Brain Research, Medical School, University of Zagreb, Croatia
Université Libre de Bruxelles, Erasme Academic Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Brussels, Belgium
Biological Psychiatry Unit and Dual Diagnosis ward IRCCS, Centro San Giovanni di Dio, FBF, Brescia, Italy
Central Institute of Mental Health, Division of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Mannheim, Germany
Department of Psychiatry, University of Bonn, Germany
Laboratory of Psychiatric Genetics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poland
Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia
Centre for Psychiatric Research and Mood Disorders Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Risskov, Denmark
Croatian Institute for Brain Research, Medical School, University of Zagreb, Croatia
Biological Psychiatry Unit and Dual Diagnosis ward IRCCS, Centro San Giovanni di Dio, FBF, Brescia, Italy
Université Libre de Bruxelles, Erasme Academic Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Brussels, Belgium
Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK.
Correspondence: Rudolf Uher, P080 SGDP, Institute of Psychiatry, 16 De Crespigny Park, SE5 8AF, London, UK. Email: r.uher{at}iop.kcl.ac.uk
S.L. owns shares in GlaxoSmithKline. N.H. participated in clinical trials sponsored by pharmaceutical companies including GlaxoSmithKline and Lundbeck. A.F., P.M. and K.J.A. have received consultancy fees and honoraria for participating in expert panels from pharmaceutical companies including Lundbeck and GlaxoSmithKline. Funding detailed in Acknowledgements.
Background
Tricyclic antidepressants and serotonin reuptake inhibitors are considered to be equally effective, but differences may have been obscured by internally inconsistent measurement scales and inefficient statistical analyses.
Aims
To test the hypothesis that escitalopram and nortriptyline differ in their effects on observed mood, cognitive and neurovegetative symptoms of depression.
Method
In a multicentre part-randomised open-label design (the Genome Based Therapeutic Drugs for Depression (GENDEP) study) 811 adults with moderate to severe unipolar depression were allocated to flexible dosage escitalopram or nortriptyline for 12 weeks. The weekly Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, and Beck Depression Inventory were scored both conventionally and in a more novel way according to dimensions of observed mood, cognitive symptoms and neurovegetative symptoms.
Results
Mixed-effect linear regression showed no difference between escitalopram and nortriptyline on the three original scales, but symptom dimensions revealed drug-specific advantages. Observed mood and cognitive symptoms improved more with escitalopram than with nortriptyline. Neurovegetative symptoms improved more with nortriptyline than with escitalopram.
Conclusions
The three symptom dimensions provided sensitive descriptors of differential antidepressant response and enabled identification of drug-specific effects.
Related articles in BJP:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Uher, A. Farmer, N. Henigsberg, M. Rietschel, O. Mors, W. Maier, D. Kozel, J. Hauser, D. Souery, A. Placentino, et al. Adverse reactions to antidepressants The British Journal of Psychiatry, September 1, 2009; 195(3): 202 - 210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Huezo-Diaz, R. Uher, R. Smith, M. Rietschel, N. Henigsberg, A. Marusic, O. Mors, W. Maier, J. Hauser, D. Souery, et al. Moderation of antidepressant response by the serotonin transporter gene The British Journal of Psychiatry, July 1, 2009; 195(1): 30 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||