The British Journal of Psychiatry (2009) 195: 391-392. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.073932
© 2009 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frances, A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frances, A.

REAPPRAISAL

Whither DSM–V?

Allen Frances, Professor Emeritus

Department of Psychiatry, Duke University Durham, North Carolina, USA. Email: allenfrances{at}vzw.blackberry.net

Declaration of interest

A.F. was Chair of the DSM–IV Task Force

ABSTRACT

The DSM–V development process started with a grand ambition to provide a ‘paradigm shift’ in psychiatric diagnosis, based initially on the identification of biological markers. This is clearly unattainable, and so energy has now been diverted into developing other major changes, including the development of dimensional ratings and the formal diagnosis of prodromal and subthreshold disorders. It is argued that this process could lead to false positive ‘epidemics’ with harmful excessive treatments. The better, more modest, alternative is to reassess the text descriptions of the disorders and join with ICD–11 in creating a single nested system for both DSM–V and ICD–11.